Space time distortion grid representations

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on visualizing space-time distortion, particularly how a 2D representation of space-time can be understood as part of a 3D grid. The original poster struggles to conceptualize the 3D implications of space-time curvature, especially in relation to black holes, and seeks clarity on how these distortions manifest in three dimensions. Participants emphasize the importance of considering both spatial and temporal dimensions in understanding gravity and space-time warping. They provide resources for better visualizations of space-time curvature. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of visualizing multi-dimensional physics concepts.
Darlo770
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a newbie here, i joined just now purely to ask this question that's been on my mind recently. Now i apologise if this question is fundamentally wrong (which it probably is), but I'm only the average person with an amateur interest in physics :P So don't laugh.
Firstly, as you know, we can visual the 'canvas' of space-time as a grid, such as here: (ignore the planet for now)

Spacetime_curvature.png
However, the above image is just a 2d 'slice'. It's obviously missing the 3rd dimension, because when we introduce the 3rd dimension, we can visualise space time like a 3d grid:

22fig03.jpg


Don't miss my point, the first image sort of is 3D, but what i mean is; it's only ONE of those flat 2D 'planes/slices' from the 3D grid/cube.Now, this is my question. If the first image is only a 2D representation of the distortion on ONE of those planes/slices, what would it look like in 3D? Immersed inside the 3D grid. A kind of 3D spherical distortion.I can imagine the first image in 3D, a sort of gentle outward 'expansion', 'bubble', 'warp', etc.. in space time. The space-time sort of curving around the sides of the body.

However, the extent of the distortion in the black hole's image makes it (for me at least) very hard to comprehend/visualise it in 3D: (if you get what I'm saying)
The distortion is too great for it fit within it's own bounds, if you get what i mean. Does that makes sense? I'm sorry this is very hard to describe.

183951.image0.jpg
Thanks, and again i apologise if there's something I've missed/don't understand properly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually that image is a 2-D slice of a 4-D object which is being warped. As the name suggests, space-time consists of the 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension, so really it's the warping in this 4-D "fabric" that "is" gravity. It is important not to ignore the warping in time.
 
Darlo770, good graphics ! Did you make them ?

(although of limited value in understanding spacetime curvature).
 
Cool, thanks everyone. I'm starting to understand it better :)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
20K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K