| New Reply |
QM: Identity |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Apr12-11, 03:47 AM | #1 |
|
|
QM: Identity
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Hi guys In my book they use the following identity [tex] e^{ - i\widehat Ht/\hbar } = e^{ - i\widehat Tt/\hbar } e^{ - i\widehat Vt/\hbar } + O(t^2 ) [/tex] where H = T+V, and the last term means "terms of order t2 or higher". I can't quite see how they reach this identity. First, I know that T and V do not commute, so I guess that is where the O(t2) comes from. Any help will be appreciated. (BTW, this is not an exercise problem -- just something in my book that I cannot understand). Best, Niles. |
| Apr12-11, 03:58 AM | #2 |
|
|
Look up the Baker-Hausdorff lemma.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: QM: Identity
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Identity homework problem | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 0 | ||
| Differentiating the identity to develop another identity | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||
| an identity | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 6 | ||
| How they got this Identity | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 10 | ||
| [Identity relations] Need help at some odd identity relation problem | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||