What is the acceleration of the mass if T1 is increased by 1.4 N?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Naeem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving forces acting on a knot held stationary by three strings. The original poster describes the scenario where the tension in one string is increased, and they seek to determine the resulting acceleration of a mass placed at the knot.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of increasing the tension in one string while keeping the others constant. Questions arise about the meaning of "sizes and directions remain the same" for the other tensions. There is discussion on how to set up equations to find the acceleration based on the new tension values.

Discussion Status

Some participants have attempted to decompose the forces and set up equations to solve for acceleration. There is recognition of previous equilibrium conditions, and one participant notes a potential issue with significant figures in their calculations. The discussion reflects a mix of approaches and interpretations without a clear consensus on the method to use.

Contextual Notes

The problem context includes specific angles and tension values, and participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment that requires careful consideration of force components and equilibrium conditions.

Naeem
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Q.
Three strings, in the horizontal plane, meet in a knot and are pulled with three forces such that the knot is held stationary. The tension in string 1 is T1 = 3 N. The angle between strings 1 and 2 is q12 = 130° and the angle between strings 1 and 3 is q13 = 120° with string 3 below string 1 as shown.

a) Find the tension in string 2.

Ans. Decomposed the tensions into there x and y components and found the tension T2 as. 2.75 N, which is correct.


b) Find the tension in string 3.

Did the same as a) and found T3 to be 2.44 N which is correct again.

A mass of 2 kg is now placed on the knot and supported by a frictionless table in the plane of the strings.

c) Find the acceleration of the mass if all the forces remain the same as above.

Ans. The forces remain the same, so the acceleration must be zero, which is correct.

d) If the sizes and directions of T2 and T3 remain the same, but T1 is increased by 1.4 N, what is the acceleration of the mass?

Ans. Stuck on this part ! Help me on this one. , what does the question mean when it says T2 and T3 the sizes and directions remain the same, does it mean T2 and T3 have same magnitude, I know T1 is increased in part d, which means new T1 would be orignal T1 + 1.4N which is 3.4 N , now.

How to setup the eqns here. PLEASE HELP ME :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Naeem said:
d) If the sizes and directions of T2 and T3 remain the same, but T1 is increased by 1.4 N, what is the acceleration of the mass?

Ans. Stuck on this part ! Help me on this one. , what does the question mean when it says T2 and T3 the sizes and directions remain the same, does it mean T2 and T3 have same magnitude, I know T1 is increased in part d, which means new T1 would be orignal T1 + 1.4N which is 3.4 N , now.

The way I read it, it's like you had the equilibrium, and an additional 1.4N were added along the first string - as if someone's pulling a little harder on rope 1.

You can either decompose all of the vectors and directions and figure things out, or you can take advantage of the fact that you already know the previous net force was zero.
 
I went with the decomposition and did as follows:

Original T1 + New T1 = 3N + 1.4N = 4.4N ; T2 = 2.75 N and T3 = 2.44 N

so,

4.4N + T2cos (130 ) + T3 cos (120) = m * a ( along the x - direction )

4.4N + 2.75N * cos (130) + 2.44N cos (120 ) = 2 * a ( along the x - direction )

Tried to solve, for a and I got 0.71 m/s2, which in incorrect. Can somebody tell me if I am missing something.

or , if there is an alternate and a much shorter method, please let me know. the fact that you already know the previous net force was zero.[/QUOTE]

Thanks,

Naeem
 
Yeah, I got it folks , problem with sig figs... answer is 0.70 m/s2..
Thanks anyway
!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K