In a book it also says g(x) h(x) etc what does it mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter roger
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the notation of functions, specifically f(x), g(x), and their implications in mathematical expressions. Participants are exploring the meaning of these notations and how they relate to variable substitution and function evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the basic definitions of function notation and the significance of the variable x within that context. Questions arise about the implications of substituting different expressions into functions, such as f(x+3) and the differences between af(x) and f(ax).

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications on function notation and evaluation, while others express concerns about potential confusion arising from simplified explanations. The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of function relationships being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing foundational concepts in function notation, with some expressing the need for caution in how these concepts are taught to avoid misunderstandings later on. The original poster is seeking clarity on specific examples and the implications of variable changes.

roger
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
Dear friends,


please can you help me to understand what f(x) means?

I am just starting out at high school maths level...

In a book it also says g(x) h(x) etc what does it mean ??

Also does the x in the brackets ever change and if so what does it mean ?


Thankyou for any advice.


Roger
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(x) and g(x) (or any other letter) are notations for functions.

f(x) is read as "eff of x".

let's say that f(x) = x+3.

that means there is a function of x that takes the input and adds 3 to it, so f(3) =3+3.

the f or g or h are just standard letters for representing functions.

You can have
f(x) = x2
g(x) = x-2

So if you want to find f(3) it would be 32=9.
g(3) would be 3-2=1

Edit: Typo, put a 3 instead of 2
 
Last edited:
^ what he said.

And also, for all intents and purposes:

f(x) = 3x

means *basically* the same thing as:

y = 3x

as you may already be familiar with this notation.
 
And also, for all intents and purposes:

f(x) = 3x

means *basically* the same thing as:

y = 3x

Ugh, don't say that. :cry: It might help him for a little while, but can only lead to confusion later.
 
Why? Do you mean because it's only true if y = f(x)? i.e. that y and f(x) could be totally different things? Or is there some other more fundamental difference between a dependent variable (whose dependence can be described as a functional relationship) and a function itself that I should have picked up on a long time ago?
 
I'm sorry. With all due respect to roger, the questions he's asking are at a pretty fundamental level (relative to a lot of the stuff on this forum in any case), and I thought that my simple (if not entirely accurate) analogy might serve him well, if only for the time being. I remember clearly being taught this new notation years back, and I definitely thought of it this way until I got my head round it all. It's also the reason I put "basically" in nice sparkly asterisks :)

Sorry for any confusion roger!
 
Sometimes using "shortcuts" does help, but you always have to remember their dangers: it may stifle one's ability to use the thing without the shortcut, or worse believe the thing is the shortcut.


I guess the reason for my reaction is that the biggest problem I've seen happen is understanding evaluation: they could tell you what f(x) is, or f(4), maybe what f(t) is, but be entirely stumped by f(x+1). Because evaluation is central to the concept of a function, I would be very hesitant to suggest anything that obscures it.
 
Strictly speaking, if "f" is a function, then "f(x)" is the (numerical) value when f is applied to the value x.
 
Dear HallsofIvy,

what if the equation is 3x^2 + 5x +9 = Y

and It says f(x+3)

Does it mean replace all of the x in the equation by x+3 ?

I'm trying to understand the difference between af(x) and f(ax) ?


Thankyou for any advice


roger
 
  • #10
if [tex]f(x)=3x^2 + 5x +9[/tex]

f(junk) tells you to take your expression for f(x) and replace every x you see with "junk", whatever the junk is. Don't hold out on the brackets, they are inexpensive.

[tex]f(x+3)=3(x+3)^2 + 5(x+3) +9[/tex]

Expand out if you wish to simplify.

f(ax) is the function applied to ax, so

[tex]f(ax)=3(ax)^{2}+5(ax)+9=3a^{2}x^{2}+5ax+9[/tex]

af(x) is the function applied to x, then the whole thing multiplied by a:

[tex]af(x)=a(3x^{2} + 5x +9)=3ax^{2}+5ax+9a[/tex]


Using f(x) as above can you find f(y)? f(x+2y)? f(x^2)? (f(x))^2?
 
  • #11
Nicely done, Shmoe
 
  • #12
shmoe said:
if [tex]f(x)=3x^2 + 5x +9[/tex]

f(junk) tells you to take your expression for f(x) and replace every x you see with "junk", whatever the junk is. Don't hold out on the brackets, they are inexpensive.

[tex]f(x+3)=3(x+3)^2 + 5(x+3) +9[/tex]

Expand out if you wish to simplify.

f(ax) is the function applied to ax, so

[tex]f(ax)=3(ax)^{2}+5(ax)+9=3a^{2}x^{2}+5ax+9[/tex]

af(x) is the function applied to x, then the whole thing multiplied by a:

[tex]af(x)=a(3x^{2} + 5x +9)=3ax^{2}+5ax+9a[/tex]


Using f(x) as above can you find f(y)? f(x+2y)? f(x^2)? (f(x))^2?

Dear Shmoe,

I've had a go, is this correct :

f(y) = 3y^2 + 5y + 9

f(x+2y) = 3(x+2y)^2 +5(x+2y) + 9

f(x^2) = 3x^4 + 5x^2 + 9

(f(x))^2 = (3x^2+5x+9)^2

But what does it actually mean by f(y) ?
Does it mean y is a function of x ?


thanx


roger
 
  • #13
All your go's are correct.
Without any other specification, inserting "y" in the x-place, (that is, in your first equation),
you've simply changed the variable name from "x" to "y" (just a notational change).
 
  • #14
> f(x+2y) = 3(x+2y)^2 +5(x+2y) + 9

In this example, you say that f depends on x and also on y, so it is a function of x and y and it is written as f(x,y). The trick of shmoe is valid, but don't forget that the information given between the brackets is the dependence of the function.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K