Solving Polar Co-ordinate Paradox: Finding \frac {\partial r} {\partial x}

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dirtydog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the differentiation of polar coordinates, specifically the partial derivative \(\frac {\partial r} {\partial x}\). Participants explore the relationships between the variables \(r\), \(x\), and \(\theta\) within the context of polar coordinates, examining different approaches to find the derivative and the implications of treating \(\theta\) as a constant versus a variable dependent on \(x\).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant derives \(\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \cos \theta\) using the equation \(r^2 = x^2 + z^2\).
  • Another participant points out that \(\theta\) is not a constant and must be treated as a variable dependent on \(x\), suggesting the use of the quotient rule for differentiation.
  • A different participant reiterates the same point, emphasizing that \(\theta\) should be considered a function of \(x\) when differentiating.
  • There is a suggestion to use \(\cos \theta = \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + z^2}}\) to find \(\frac {\partial \theta} {\partial x}\).
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the differentiation process and acknowledges the need for clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that \(\theta\) is dependent on \(x\) and that this dependency affects the differentiation process. However, there is no consensus on the correct approach to finding \(\frac {\partial r} {\partial x}\) as different methods yield different results.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the mathematical steps involved in differentiating with respect to \(x\), particularly regarding the treatment of \(\theta\) as a variable. The discussion highlights the complexity of the relationships in polar coordinates.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners dealing with polar coordinates in mathematics or physics, particularly those interested in differentiation techniques and the implications of variable dependencies.

dirtydog
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi I am having a bit of difficulty working with plane polar co-ordinates.
We have:
[tex]r^2 = x^2 + z^2[/tex]
[tex]x = r cos \theta[/tex]
[tex]z=r sin \theta[/tex]
I wish to find [tex]\frac {\partial r} {\partial x}[/tex]

Using [tex]r^2 = x^2 + z^2[/tex]
We have:

[tex]\frac {\partial (r^2)} {\partial x} = \frac {\partial (x^2)} {\partial x} + \frac {\partial (z^2)} {\partial x}[/tex]
Thus [tex]2r\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = 2x[/tex]
[tex]\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {x} {r} = \frac {r cos \theta} {r}[/tex]
Therefore [tex]\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = cos \theta[/tex]

But if we find [tex]\frac {\partial r} {\partial x}[/tex] using [tex]x = r cos \theta[/tex]
We have:
[tex]r = \frac {x} {cos \theta}[/tex]
Therefore [tex]\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {1} {cos \theta}[/tex]

What is going on here? Which answer is wrong and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ooops! In your last step you [itex]\theta[/itex] is NOT a constant! You need to differentiate it wrt x as well.
 
dirtydog said:
But if we find [tex]\frac {\partial r} {\partial x}[/tex] using [tex]x = r cos \theta[/tex]
We have:
[tex]r = \frac {x} {cos \theta}[/tex]
Therefore [tex]\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {1} {cos \theta}[/tex]

Hi, when you differentiated with respect to x here, you treated [tex]\theta[/tex] as a constant. It's not, it's dependent on x, so you have to use the quotient rule and you'll have a [tex]\frac {\partial \theta} {\partial x}[/tex] appear via the chain rule. Use [tex]{\cos \theta}=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+z^2}}[/tex] to work out [tex]\frac {\partial \theta} {\partial x}[/tex].

eidt-Tide was quicker on the draw!
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure, but I think your mistake is in the following procedure:

[tex]r = \frac {x} {cos \theta} \rightarrow \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {1} {cos \theta}[/tex]

I believe that [tex]\theta[/tex] is dependent on [tex]x[/tex]. In other words [tex]\theta = \theta (x)[/tex] so you can't just treat [tex]cos \theta[/tex] as a constant when taking the derivative with respect to [tex]x[/tex].
 
Whoops! I guess I'm pretty late on that one!

This is the first time I used the equation formatting and it took me a while to format the post. (ha ha)

At least, I know now that I was on the right track. :smile:
 
Way to go, NS!
 
Thanks for your help guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K