Register to reply

Young's Double Slit Experiment

by cupid.callin
Tags: double, experiment, slit, young
Share this thread:
cupid.callin
#1
May12-11, 11:24 AM
P: 1,135
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data




so here i have shown the distances of two dark fringes ...

from here ... fringe width is [tex]\frac{\lambda L}{2d}[/tex]
L is distance of screen ... d is distance b/w 2 fringes.

but fringe width is [tex]\frac{\lambda L}{d}[/tex] , right ???

What mistake am i making?
Attached Thumbnails
Untitled.png  
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Wildfires and other burns play bigger role in climate change, professor finds
SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas
New study advances 'DNA revolution,' tells butterflies' evolutionary history
Gregg
#2
May12-11, 12:02 PM
P: 463
What's the question?
cupid.callin
#3
May12-11, 01:43 PM
P: 1,135
i wrote it above

by using formula of distance of dark fringe ...

fringe width comes out to be ... [tex]
\frac{\lambda L}{2d}
[/tex]

but fringe width is [tex]
\frac{\lambda L}{d}
[/tex]

so why am i getting wrong answer

cupid.callin
#4
May13-11, 12:03 AM
P: 1,135
Young's Double Slit Experiment

hello ... someone?
Dadface
#5
May13-11, 02:56 AM
PF Gold
Dadface's Avatar
P: 2,011
The fringe width is the distance between the centres of alternate dark(or bright) fringes.
Lamda D/d as marked on your diagram goes from the centre of a bright fringe to the centre of an adjacent dark fringe in other words you have marked in half the fringe width.
cupid.callin
#6
May13-11, 04:28 AM
P: 1,135
So you mean this is fringe width ??

well this looks satisfying
Attached Thumbnails
Untitled.png  
Dadface
#7
May13-11, 05:05 AM
PF Gold
Dadface's Avatar
P: 2,011
Quote Quote by cupid.callin View Post
So you mean this is fringe width ??

well this looks satisfying
You have now marked the fringe width correctly.
cupid.callin
#8
May14-11, 12:37 AM
P: 1,135
are you sure?
because fringe width means "width of 1 fringe"
but (as you said) i have marked width of 2 fringes
Dadface
#9
May14-11, 02:36 AM
PF Gold
Dadface's Avatar
P: 2,011
I did not say you marked in the width of two fringes I said you marked in the width of half a fringe.The fringe width as marked above in red is correct since it goes from the centre of a bright fringe to the centre of an adjacent bright fringe.
Look at a graph of how the intensity varies smoothly across an interference pattern and this should clarify things for you.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Young's Double Slit Experiment - Slit Separation Calculation Introductory Physics Homework 2
Young's double slit experiment (shallow slit and deep slit) General Physics 4
Young's double slit experiment Classical Physics 5
Young's Double-Slit Experiment Introductory Physics Homework 1
Young's double slit experiment Classical Physics 3