Did I Approach the Electrostatic Force Derivative Correctly?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electrostatic force and its derivation in the context of forces acting on an object, particularly involving tension and gravitational force. The original poster attempts to derive an expression for the electric field based on the balance of forces, while also addressing components of the forces involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between electrostatic force and tension, questioning the initial assumption that the electrostatic force equals the gravitational force. There are attempts to clarify the components of the electric field and the role of tension in the system.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing feedback on the original poster's approach, with suggestions for clarification and corrections regarding the components of forces. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and relationships between the forces involved, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding terminology, specifically the distinction between "derivation" and "derivative." There is also a mention of the diagram being referenced, which is not visible in the text, potentially limiting full understanding of the problem setup.

a_ng116
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Well,I've tried attempting this problem but I am not sure if I approached it the right way. Here is a link for the diagram and the question.

[PLAIN]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v367/crazy_cat_lady/physics/diagram1.bmp[/URL]

If anyone could check it over and point out any mistakes and tell me if I make any sense what so ever,then you would make my day.

My solution:

Fe=Fg therefore
qE=mg ------> E=mg/q

x-component: Ex¹= Ecosø
= Fe/q cosø
= mg/q cosø

y-component: Ey¹= Esinø
= Fe/q sinø
= mg/q sinø

E¹= square root of (mg/cosø)² + (mg/sinø)²

Another solution that I thought up of:

Isn't tension just the sum of all forces acting on a object...therefore:

Ft= Fe+Fg
Fe= Fg-Ft
= mgsinø- Ft
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
a_ng116 said:
Fe=Fg

Just wondering why this very first step? I didn't see that in the problem, although I could be blind :smile:

Also, just as an FYI, it should be a 'derivation' in the thread title, since that is the term for arriving at an equation by deriving it. A "derivative" is something else in calculus, and so that confused me initially.

If you explain that first step, I should be able to help further...

As for this question:

a_ng116 said:
Isn't tension just the sum of all forces acting on a object...

I'm afraid that the answer, in general, is no. Tension is just the name given to a force tending to 'stretch' an object, i.e. pull it apart. When referring to some object suspended by a rope, the object pulls on the rope, which pulls back up on the object, keeping it suspended. The rope is taut, not slack, so it is in tension.
 
Yeah, the first line of your working should be Fe = Ftsin θ.

Also, how are you getting x and y components of the electric field? E is in the direction of Fe and from the diagram, Fe is only in the x direction.
 
Hmmm...alright.It actually somewhat makes sense. There is only an x-component to the electrostatic force so starting with what nylex suggested Fe=Ftsinø,would it be true then to say that:

Fe=Ft-Fgsinø
= ma- mgsinø

My rationale for this is that Earth exerts a downward force F=-mg on the test body correct?So the test body exerts and upward force F=+mg on the earth. The upward force is caused by the tension on the thread holding the test body and this is working against gravity keeping it suspended, hence Ft=ma. Anyways...more feedback would be much appreciated even despite not making much sense before in my previous derivation. And you know, if I'm completely wrong again here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
2K