Engine balancing:possibility of a completely balanced engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter monty37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of engine balancing, specifically whether it is possible to achieve a completely balanced engine. Participants explore various engine configurations, the definitions of balancing, and the implications of vibrations caused by engine components. The conversation includes both theoretical and practical considerations related to engine design and performance testing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that certain engine configurations, like V12 and straight 6 engines, can be considered completely balanced in primary and secondary modes.
  • Others argue that the term "completely balanced" is ambiguous and depends on the definitions of balancing and the specific engine design.
  • One participant mentions a specific engine model, the Maruti Suzuki Swift diesel, which was described as completely balanced, while another participant contests this notion, stating that complete balance is impossible.
  • Participants discuss primary and secondary modes of vibrations, with primary modes occurring at engine speed and secondary modes at twice that speed, influenced by component weights and motion.
  • A proposal is made to conduct performance tests on an imbalanced engine to understand the effects of balancing on performance.
  • There is a distinction made between component balancing (matching weights of parts) and inherent balance (a function of engine design), with some configurations being inherently balanced and others not.
  • One participant shares a historical perspective from Smokey Yunick, emphasizing that while balancing can improve longevity, it may not significantly enhance performance, especially at high RPMs due to oil dynamics.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that improving component balance only benefits a specific engine speed, suggesting that it can have broader implications.
  • Discussion includes the importance of balancing both the weight of identical components and the crankshaft according to those weights, noting that the effectiveness can vary across RPM ranges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the possibility of achieving a completely balanced engine, with no consensus reached on the definitions and implications of balancing in different engine configurations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of balance, the dependence on specific engine designs, and unresolved discussions regarding the impact of oil dynamics on engine performance and balancing effectiveness.

monty37
Messages
225
Reaction score
1
Is it possible for engines to be completely balanced?well I recently saw an engine manufacturing facility where crankshafts were machined , balanced and then assembled ,hence when the engine finally comes out can it be called a completely balanced engine?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
V12, straight 6, boxer engines. The only 'completely balanced' engines there are, in the primary and secondary modes.

Depends on what you mean by balanced though.
 
Why I was told a particular maruti Suzuki swift diesel engine was also completely balanced,but there is another school of thought which said it is impossible to have a completely balanced engine.Balancing would mean eliminating any kind of vibration that might be caused as the Con-rod,the crankshaft and other parts work together by adding or removing weight accordingly.also tell me what are primary and secondary modes?
 
Primary modes are vibrations at the first harmonic (at the engine speed/frequency), imblanaces caused by variations in the component weights.

Secondary modes are 2nd harmonic (occurring at twice the engine speed) vibrations caused by non sinusodal motion of the pistons amongst other things.

Inherently balanced engines have motions that cancel each other out. Meaning no vibrations. Engines that have secondary imbalances can have balancing shafts to counter the vibrations caused by the engine.I feel that the above is a bit of a superficial answer, as it could be found on wiki, but I don't want to delve into too much depth as I don't understand it fully enough to explain it properly.
 
I would like to do an analysis by conducting a performance test on an imbalanced engine to know how balancing affects performance,and compare with that of a balanced one.
You think this can help me get a good insight ?
 
Monty,

I think the kind of balancing you're talking about is component balancing (balancing the crankshaft, matching pistons and rods etc) which can be applied to any engine - production 4 cylinder engines are quite highly balanced these days, but they're not 'inherently' balanced.

However, (as Chris says), there's a slightly different concept called inherent balance, and this is a function of engine design rather than manufacturing tolerance. Certain engine configurations (1, 3 and 4 cylinder inline engines, V6, V8) cannot be inherently balanced, because (on a basic level) you have bits of metal going up and down which cause vibration. However, a straight 6, a flat 6 and a V12 engine (and a few other configurations) are said to be 'inherently balanced' because the movement of the reciprocating components is such that vibrations are canceled out.

Before you do too much, you should make sure you're comfortable with both of these concepts, understand the difference, and decide what you're actually looking to investigate.

The Wikipedia article is excellent...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_balance
 
my two and 1/2 cents..Smokey Yunick summed it up once. You can balance the rotating and reciprocating parts in an engine and even work out the formula for on particular RPM and the engine will be " balanced" for that narrow crank speed range. Thats about all you can do until some one figures out how to oil the darn thing without a bunch of oil flinging and flying all over the place. Smokey made a clear plastic oil pan and watched the oil at high revs..total classic " hot mess"..oil was randomly clinging to the center of the crank and then the ends with no real pattern...his advise is to not worry too much about balance ..get the parts with in one to two grams of each other and run it...he did go on to discuss harmonic balancers, flywheels, weight and diameter..but that is another post

one final note..balancing is , in my opinion, done for longevity and not so much for performance..although the valvetrain can really go awry if you have random harmonics introduced ..this is why NASCAR engine builders went with timing belts vs timing chains and gears..more stable and consistent valve timing made more hp
 
Ranger, I don't think that's quite right. Improving component balance at a particular engine speed will improve balance under all conditions, not just at that particular condition. I do agree that there's a 'diminishing returns' effect and that you can spend a lot of money on very fine component balancing without seeing any improvement (because other factors like oil, as you mentioned, begin to take over).
 
Brews..good one..i stand corrected..thanks..rm
 
  • #10
There are two parts of balancing: equalize the weight of all the identical components (pistons and rods mainly) then balancing the crankshaft according to the component weights.

The first one works at all rpm, the second over a specific range and for certain engines the crank can be under or overbalanced.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K