Optimizing Area: Finding the Minimum Value of Sum of Squares for Cut Rectangles

  • Thread starter Thread starter matpo39
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem involving the optimization of the area of a rectangle that is divided into four smaller rectangles. Participants are tasked with finding the minimum value of the sum of the squares of the areas of these smaller rectangles, as well as demonstrating a condition for maximum area when the rectangle is not cut.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the sum of the squares of the areas but expresses uncertainty about their calculations. They also consider using Lagrange multipliers as a potential method for solving the problem.
  • Another participant questions the assumption that the area of the smaller rectangles is simply one-fourth of the total area, suggesting a different approach to defining the areas based on the cuts made.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods and questioning assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the formulation of the areas of the smaller rectangles, but no consensus or resolution has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the definitions of the areas involved and the implications of different cutting strategies. There may be constraints related to the specific requirements of the homework assignment that are influencing the discussion.

matpo39
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I am having a little bit of trouble with one of my math problems.

a) A rectanglewith length L and width W is cut into four smaller rectangles by two lines parallel to the sides. Find the minimum value of the sum of the squares of the areas of the smaller rectangles.

b) Show that the maximum of the sum of the squares of the areas occurs when cutting lines correspond to sides of the rectangle (so that there is only one rectangle).

i started part a) and this is what i got so far:

A=LW , A(small)=a , a=1/4*LW

so da/dL = (1/4)*W and da/dW= (1/4)*L

and the sum of the squares of all these are equal to 0 so
4[1/16(L^2+W^2)] = 0
1/4(L^2+W^2) = 0

I don't think that this is right though, can anyone help me out here?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
after thinking about it for a bit, i am now wondering if it would be easier if i were to try to use lagrange multipliers to solve this, but I am not too sure how i would implement them.
 
matpo30 said:
A=LW , A(small)=a , a=1/4*LW

Where're you getting this statement? Particularly that the area of the smaller rectangles is simply 1/4 the total area?

Let l be the length to the cut along the L side and w the length to the cut along the W side. Then,

a1 = lw
a2 = l(W-w)
a3 = (L - l)w
a4 = (L - l)(W - w)

and a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 = A (Note: this last equation won't help you).

See if you can't get that to work.

--Justin
 
I'm stuck on a similar problem and I'm not sure where to go from here. Help? Thanks a bunch! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K