Equilibrium and tension problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a wire supporting a 30-kg beam and the force exerted by the wall on the beam. The correct tension in the wire, denoted as F_{t}, is calculated to be 1.9 x 10^2 N using the equation F_{ty} = 147 N and F_{t} = F_{ty}/sin 50. The force exerted by the wall, F_{w}, is determined to be 102.11 N after correcting a miscalculation that initially suggested a value of 160.13 N. The key equations used include the sum of torques and the sum of forces in both x and y directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with torque calculations
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Proficiency in using trigonometric functions for force resolution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study static equilibrium problems involving multiple forces
  • Learn about torque and its applications in engineering mechanics
  • Explore vector resolution techniques in physics
  • Review trigonometric identities and their use in force calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, educators teaching mechanics, and professionals involved in structural analysis or design.

FarazAli
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
The problem as stated in the book
"Calculate the tension [tex]F_{t}[/tex] in the wire that supports the 30-kg beam shown in fig. 9-57 (attached), and the force [tex]F_{w}[/tex] exerted by the wall on the beam (give magnitude and direction)."

Getting the Tension in the string was easy.
[tex]\sum\tau = F_{ty} \cdot x_{1} - mg(\frac{x_{1}}{2}) = 0[/tex]
[tex]F_{ty} = 147N[/tex]
[tex]F_{t} = \frac{F_{ty}}{sin 50} = 1.9 \times 10^2N[/tex]

To get the [tex]F_{w}[/tex], I used the sum of forces.
[tex]\sum{F_{x}} = F_{tx} - F_{wx} = 0 \Rightarrow F_{tx} = F_{wx} = F_{t} \cdot cos 50 = 123.35 N[/tex]
[tex]\sum{F_{y}} = F_{ty} + F_{wy} - mg \Rightarrow F_{wy} = mg - F_{ty} = 102.11 N[/tex]

So now I have the two components for [tex]F_{w}[/tex] , I use pythagorous and solve for the resultant vector to get 160.13 N. The book, however, says the answer is [tex]1.9 \times 10^2 N[/tex]. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.GIF
    untitled.GIF
    1.5 KB · Views: 902
Physics news on Phys.org
nevermind, the problem was when I confused [tex]F_{wy}[/tex] for [tex]F_{w}[/tex]
 
Last edited:


In this problem, you are trying to find the tension in the wire and the force exerted by the wall on the beam. The equation you used to find the tension in the wire (F_{ty} = 147N) is correct. However, when finding the force exerted by the wall, you made a mistake in your calculation.

To find the force exerted by the wall, you need to use the equation \sum{F_{y}} = F_{ty} + F_{wy} - mg. This equation takes into account the weight of the beam (mg) and the tension in the wire (F_{ty}). So the correct equation would be F_{wy} = mg - F_{ty} = 102.11 N. This means that the force exerted by the wall is actually 102.11 N, not 160.13 N as you calculated.

To understand why your calculation was incorrect, you need to think about the forces acting on the beam. The weight of the beam is pulling down with a force of mg, and the tension in the wire is pulling up with a force of F_{ty}. The force exerted by the wall must balance out these two forces, which means it must be equal in magnitude but in the opposite direction. So, when you used the equation \sum{F_{y}} = F_{ty} + F_{wy} - mg, you were essentially adding the weight of the beam twice, which resulted in the incorrect value of 160.13 N for the force exerted by the wall.

In conclusion, to find the force exerted by the wall, you need to use the correct equation and take into account the weight of the beam. Your calculation for the tension in the wire is correct, but your calculation for the force exerted by the wall was incorrect due to a mistake in the equation used.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K