New Reply

Diagonalization

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jul17-11, 06:14 PM   #1
 

Diagonalization


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

I think my teacher made a mistake in his homework answer. I need to verify this for practice. The answer I got is below. The answer the teacher has is in the pdf.

2. Relevant equations

Please refer to attached pdf

3. The attempt at a solution

So there is two eigenvalues= 4 and 2
but the eigenvalue 2 has 2 eigenvectors [-1 1 0]T and [0 0 1]T but my teacher has only one [-1 1 0]T. That's why he says A is not diagonalizable. Do you think it's correct?
Attached Thumbnails
A7-Answers-2.jpg  
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Front-row seats to climate change
>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays
>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug
Jul17-11, 08:40 PM   #2
 
I get the same result as your teacher for [tex] \lambda = 2 [/tex]

[tex] A= \begin{bmatrix}
3 & 1 & 0\\
0 & 2 & 1\\
1 & 1 & 3
\end{bmatrix}
[/tex]

so for lamda = 2,
[tex] (A-2I)\vec{v}=\vec{0} [/tex]
[tex] \begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 1\\
1 & 1 & 1
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
v_1\\
v_2\\
v_3
\end{bmatrix}
= \begin{bmatrix}
0\\
0\\
0\\
\end{bmatrix}
[/tex]
I've personally always found it easier to not do row operations here and just jump straight in. From that you get
[tex] v_3 = 0 [/tex] and [tex] v_1 = -v_2 [/tex]
so therefore [tex] \vec{v} = \begin{bmatrix}
1\\
-1\\
0
\end{bmatrix}
[/tex]

Since it is a 3x3 matrix, it needs 3 eigenvectors to be diagonalizable.

Hope this helps.
 
Jul18-11, 12:18 AM   #3
 
Hi, thanks for replying. Attached is how I got my vectors, do you think my steps are correct.
Attached Thumbnails
Untitled-1.jpg  
 
Jul18-11, 04:33 AM   #4
 
Mentor

Diagonalization


No. Why do you think (0, 0, 1) is an eigenvector? You seem to just pull that out of thin air.
 
Jul18-11, 06:37 AM   #5
 
You seem to have made a mistake in the step
[tex] (A-2I)\vec{v}=\vec{0} [/tex]
Why is your second row 1 0 1 instead of 0 0 1 ?
Have you said [tex] v_2= \delta [/tex] ? I'm not sure if I have read that correctly. If it is a delta, you can't say that unless the whole row equals zero. i.e.
[tex] \begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
v_1
\end{bmatrix}
= \begin{bmatrix}
0
\end{bmatrix}
[/tex]
 
New Reply

Tags
algebra, diagonalization, eigenvalue, linear
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Diagonalization
Thread Forum Replies
Diagonalization Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Diagonalization Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Diagonalization Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
diagonalize operator A by matrix S Quantum Physics 1
How exactly does diagonalization work and how is it useful in qm? Quantum Physics 2