New Reply

Mass of trapped photons vs. Mass of potential energy

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jul20-11, 12:09 AM   #1
 

Mass of trapped photons vs. Mass of potential energy


I've understood for a while that a black hole is made more massive simply by shining light on it; the energy of the photons "goes towards" (for lack of a more informed/accurate term) the mass of the black hole. Also, a couple weeks back, someone on the forums said that if one had a container lined with perfect mirrors, then photons trapped inside the container would effectively add mass to the object. If this is true, then it occurred to me that a system could conceivably change its mass by sequestering photons within itself.

Imagine the following system: two heavy masses, at rest relative to each other, are held apart by a scaffold of some kind. The scaffold has a track which will allow the masses to fall towards each other, driving an electricity generator as they go. The generator is hooked up to a lamp which shines into a really, really long perfect-mirror-container, with another perfect mirror ready to slide down in front of the lamp (to close the container). Let's say the total mass of all the components of the system is M.

When this contraption is triggered, the masses fall towards each other, the lamp shines, and the mirror snaps shut before the light returns from the far end of the container. We now have the same system, with none of its particles missing, except now we also have a perfect-mirror-container full of photons.

Is the total mass of the system still M? Or is it slightly more? If the mass is the same, then where did the mass of the trapped photons "live" before they were generated?

Thanks in advance for any input / explanation / humbling rebuke.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Jul20-11, 12:32 AM   #2
 
Still M. The energy that made the photons came from the gravity field itself. The net far-field gravity is the same though the two masses have a quadupole moment that would be different for the box of photons.
Jul20-11, 06:00 AM   #3
 
Mentor
Quote by cephron View Post
Imagine the following system: two heavy masses, at rest relative to each other, are held apart by a scaffold of some kind. The scaffold has a track which will allow the masses to fall towards each other, driving an electricity generator as they go. The generator is hooked up to a lamp which shines into a really, really long perfect-mirror-container, with another perfect mirror ready to slide down in front of the lamp (to close the container). Let's say the total mass of all the components of the system is M.

When this contraption is triggered, the masses fall towards each other, the lamp shines, and the mirror snaps shut before the light returns from the far end of the container. We now have the same system, with none of its particles missing, except now we also have a perfect-mirror-container full of photons.

Is the total mass of the system still M? Or is it slightly more? If the mass is the same, then where did the mass of the trapped photons "live" before they were generated?
The mass is the same. You should read the wikipedia article on binding energy, particularly the section on mass deficit. In this case the two masses are a more tightly bound system afterwards, so there is a mass deficit in the system. Assuming 100% efficiency everywhere that mass deficit is exactly equal to the mass gain from the photons.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Mass of trapped photons vs. Mass of potential energy
Thread Forum Replies
Mass of potential energy Special & General Relativity 11
Photons, energy and mass General Physics 10
Photons have energy but zero mass?? General Physics 12
potential energy mass equivalency General Physics 12