How Is the Speed of Light Measured in a Recursive Universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around various methods of measuring the speed of light, exploring historical techniques, modern classroom experiments, and the implications of these measurements within the context of a recursive universe. The scope includes historical anecdotes, experimental approaches, and conceptual reflections on the nature of light speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe historical methods for measuring the speed of light, such as the rotating hexagonal disc and the lanterns on hilltops, noting the limitations of human reaction time in these early experiments.
  • Others mention the SI definition of the speed of light in vacuum as 299,792,458 m/s and discuss its implications for measurements in different media.
  • A participant shares a modern classroom experiment using marshmallows and microwaves to demonstrate the speed of light, highlighting its accessibility and effectiveness.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliance on known values, such as microwave frequency, in experimental setups, suggesting a circular reasoning issue in determining the speed of light.
  • Some participants express amusement and nostalgia regarding the historical anecdotes, reflecting on the educational value and engagement these stories provide.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants share various methods and anecdotes without reaching a consensus on the best approach to measure the speed of light. Disagreements exist regarding the reliability of historical methods and the implications of modern experiments.

Contextual Notes

Some methods discussed rely on assumptions about human reaction time and the accuracy of measurements, which may not be fully addressed in the conversation. The dependence on established values, such as the frequency of microwaves, raises questions about the circularity of some experimental claims.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students, educators, and enthusiasts in physics, particularly those exploring experimental methods and historical perspectives on the speed of light.

heman
Messages
353
Reaction score
0
how to measure speed of light??
 
Science news on Phys.org
The first accurate measurement involved a rotating hexagonal disc and a beam of light was shone on the hexagonal mirror which reflected the beam to another mirror a long distance away. When the beam struck the second mirror it was reflected to an observer. The speed was then determined by knowing how far the light traveled in total and how fast the hexagonal mirror was rotating to make the light beam constant to the observer.
 
The speed of light in vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 m/s (metres per second)

In 1983 the SI (Systeme International) defined a metre as:


The metre is the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.
When people refer to the speed of light, they refer to the definition above - the speed of light in a vacuum.

The speed of light is normally rounded to 300 000 kilometers per second or 186 000 miles per second.

The speed of light depends on the material that the light moves through - for example: light moves slower in water, glass and through the atmosphere than in a vacuum. The ratio whereby light is slowed down is called the refractive index of that medium.

In general, the difference in the speed of light in other mediums is ignored.
http://www.what-is-the-speed-of-light.com/

this sight might help you...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My favorite speed of light measurment was earlier though. Consisted of two guys with lanterns on different hill tops. One of them would uncover his lantern and the other would uncover his as soon as he saw the first one. Their value for the speed of light? "Extremely fast"

(Wish I could remember who they were.)
 
dyknowsore said:
My favorite speed of light measurment was earlier though. Consisted of two guys with lanterns on different hill tops. One of them would uncover his lantern and the other would uncover his as soon as he saw the first one. Their value for the speed of light? "Extremely fast"

(Wish I could remember who they were.)

holy cow, i heard this story too. my physics teacher mentioned it, when i started to learn modern physics. it was a blast, half of the class couldn't stop laughing! :smile:
 
dyknowsore said:
My favorite speed of light measurment was earlier though. Consisted of two guys with lanterns on different hill tops. One of them would uncover his lantern and the other would uncover his as soon as he saw the first one. Their value for the speed of light? "Extremely fast"

(Wish I could remember who they were.)

Think it's the great Galileo! http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/waves_particles/lightspeed_evidence.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, lol. Their intentions were good, but no matter how far away the hilltop on which Galileo's assitant was standing, the measured value for the speed of light did not change significantly, suggesting that the value was mostly error due to human reaction time. So IIRC their result was that the speed of light was either infinite or too fast for human reaction time to be measured. Either way, "extremely fast".

Some Danish physicist, Ole Roemer, first proved it was finite when he noticed that the perceived time for a moon of Jupiter to pass completely behind the disk of the planet would change depending on the time of year it was measured (i.e. at what point the Earth was in its orbit, and therefore how far it was from Jupiter).
 
Here's my favourite method:
Finding the Speed of Light with Marshmallows-A Take-Home Lab

Robert H. Stauffer, Jr., Cimarron-Memorial High School, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

I have heard that at 16 years old, Albert Einstein constantly wondered what it would be like to ride on a beam of light. Students in physics always seem to be fascinated by the properties of light. However, speed-of-light demonstrations often require extensive preparation or expensive equipment. I have prepared a simple classroom demonstration that the students can also use as a take-home lab.

The activity requires a microwave oven, a microwave-safe casserole dish, a bag of marshmallows, and a ruler. (The oven must be of the type that has no mechanical motion-no turntable or rotating mirror. If there is a turn-table, remove it first.) First, open the marshmallows and place them in the casserole dish, completely covering it with a layer one marshmallow thick. Next, put the dish of marshmallows in the microwave and cook on low heat. Microwaves do not cook evenly and the marshmallows will begin to melt at the hottest spots in the microwave. (I leaned this from our Food Science teacher Anita Cornwall.) Heat the marshmallows until they begin to melt in four or five different spots. Remove the dish from the microwave and observe the melted spots. Take the ruler and measure the distance between the melted spots. You will find that one distance repeats over and over. This distance will correspond to half the wavelength of the microwave, about 6 cm. Now turn the oven around and look for a small sign that gives you the frequency of the microwave. Most commercial microwaves operate at 2450 MHz.

All you do now is multiply the frequency by the wavelength. The product is the speed of light.

Example:

Velocity = Frequency x Wavelength

Velocity = 2450 MHz x 0.122 m

Velocity = 2.99 x 10^8 m/s

This works in my physics class, often with less than 5% error. Then the students can eat the marshmallows.

(Reprinted with permission from The Physics Teacher, vol. 35, April 1997, p. 231. Copyright 1997 American Association of Physics Teachers )
 
That's really cool CeeAnne! It's amazing that we can measure the speed of light based on what we all have in our kitchen.
 
  • #10
I have heard this technique, although it was done with processed cheese slices, which probably lay out better in a sheet than do marshmallows.

The only complaint I have about the experiment is that fact that the required piece of data - the frequency of the microwaves - has to be given. We have to take someone else's word for it. And how they know it, is because they already know speed of light!
 
  • #11
It's a recursive universe, Dave ... d a r n .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K