|Jul28-11, 05:17 PM||#1|
Optical trap, choosing the right condenser NA illuminate QPD
Hi, I am looking to illuminate a quadrant photo diode using a condenser/ lens combination in a optical trap setup. I see thorlabs has a kit that has a 100x objective as a trap and a 10x objective as a condenser. Does that mean that one doesnt need to collect all the laser light scattered from a 1.25 NA objective, because surely a 0.25 NA condenser cannot do that. I have always thought it is critical to image the whole laser onto the QPD but maybe it is not. Any inputs?
|Jul28-11, 08:02 PM||#2|
The QPD does not need to collect the entire amount of light, only enough to detect the change in diffraction pattern as the trapped particle moves. We're still debugging the QPD data analysis software, but we seem to be able to generate useful datasets fairly easily.
My setup uses either a 63X NA 0.9 dipping or a 100X NA 1.47 immersion objective lens, and we defocus the condenser (NA 0.85 IIRC) slightly off Kohler conditions to (we hope) increase the sensitivity at the QPD.
PM me if you'd like to discuss more, let me know how it goes!
|Similar Threads for: Optical trap, choosing the right condenser NA illuminate QPD|
|Time orbiting potential trap (TOP-trap)||Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics||1|
|help me in choosing optical chopper||Electrical Engineering||1|
|optical dipole trap for bec||Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics||1|
|Magneto-Optical Trap||Quantum Physics||0|
|Ultrastable Optical Clock with Neutral Atoms in an Engineered Light Shift Trap||General Physics||0|