| New Reply |
Non-diagonality of Dirac's Hamiltonian |
Share Thread |
| Aug18-11, 07:40 AM | #1 |
|
|
Non-diagonality of Dirac's Hamiltonian
Hi all,
My question is why Dirac's Hamiltonian isn't diagonal? As much as I understand, the momentum of the particle and it's spin belong to the complete set of commuting variables, which define the state of the particle, and their eigenstates must also be energy eigenstates. But because Hamiltonian is non-diagonal (because gamma matrices are not diagonal), it follows that if we have a particle with definite momentum and definite spin, with time it is going to change it's state to become a particle with no definite spin. Where am I wrong? |
| Aug18-11, 10:14 AM | #2 |
|
|
The spin vector operator is no constant of motion (doesn't commute with the Hamiltonian, which is time-independent) for the Dirac' Hamiltonian, but [tex] \vec{S} \cdot \vec{P} [/tex] is.
|
| Aug18-11, 11:48 AM | #3 |
|
|
thanks, don't know why it's not written in the textbook, and I made a wrong assumption
|
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| dirac, hamiltonian, spin |
Similar discussions for: Non-diagonality of Dirac's Hamiltonian
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Lagrangian, Hamiltonian and Legendre transform of Dirac field. | Quantum Physics | 18 | ||
| free-field Dirac Hamiltonian | Advanced Physics Homework | 1 | ||
| Hamiltonian, Lagrange multipliers and Dirac's Programme | Classical Physics | 2 | ||
| Diagonality of an Observable Operator | General Physics | 3 | ||
| Angular momentum vs the Hamiltonian problem in the Dirac field theory (canonical) | Quantum Physics | 8 | ||