Kikuchiyo's two pictures of time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pictures Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on two animated representations of time shared by user Kikuchiyo, specifically a time-line picture and a falling-leaves picture. The key distinction lies in the mathematical concepts of "linear ordering" versus "partial ordering." The falling-leaves picture exemplifies a locally finite partial-ordered set, which is crucial in understanding causality in both classical general relativity and quantum gravity. The conversation references the paper "Evolution in Quantum Causal Histories" by Fotini Markopoulos, Eli Hawkins, and Hanno Sahlmann, highlighting the significance of partial orderings in the study of time and causality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical concepts such as "linear ordering" and "partial ordering."
  • Familiarity with general relativity (GR) and its implications on spacetime and causality.
  • Knowledge of quantum gravity and its departure from traditional spacetime models.
  • Basic comprehension of Hilbert spaces and their role in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of "partial ordering" in mathematical literature.
  • Research the implications of "quantum causal histories" as discussed in the paper by Markopoulos, Hawkins, and Sahlmann.
  • Investigate the relationship between spinfoam models and algebraic quantum field theory.
  • Learn about the applications of directed sets in mathematical physics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum gravity, causality, and the mathematical modeling of time.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
Over in "Theoretical" forum a new poster kikuchiyo put up two animated pictures of time.

A. http://homepage.mac.com/aglaser/time.swf

B. http://homepage.mac.com/aglaser/time2.swf

one is the time-line picture and the other is the falling-leaves picture

I think one's focus should not be "Which picture is right?" but
"How do I understand the falling leaves picture?"

In mathematical terms the difference is between a "linear ordering" and a "partial ordering" relation

if two leaves overlap you can tell which precedes which
and presumably its a transitive relation (yes, kikuchiyo?) which
means that if A precedes B precedes C then A precedes C

the partial ordering idea has interested mathematicians and they have learned some things about partial orderings
there is also the idea of a "directed set" which is a little stronger than a partial ordering but still not a linear ordering----a directed set allows taking limits and some interesting collections of things turn out to be partial-ordered and in some cases directed.
It seems like not a bad idea to see if time can be understood in these terms
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0302111

I just had a look at a paper dated August 2003 (though numbered as if earlier) called "Evolution in Quantum Causal Histories" by Fotini Markopoulos, Eli Hawkins, and Hanno Sahlmann

Sure enough a quantum causal history is a locally finite partial-ordered set

in classical GR spacetime the events form a partial-ordered set---that is the mathematical realization of causality

two events x and y are "spatially separated" if neither precedes the other in the ordering

they go over all the definitions and it seems nice


For quantum gravity, she just throws away the spacetime manifold and all she has left is a partial-ordered set of events
and she attaches to each event a finite dimensional Hilbert space

and then she starts describing structures that other people study using this: for instance she describes spinfoam models of spacetime and
algebraic quantum field theory (whatever that is)
quantum information theory (ditto)

I suspect that if time exists at all there's more to it than a straight line

maybe I didnt say it clearly enough: kikuchiyo animated picture B is of a locally finite partial-ordered set (if you had to give a general mathematical description)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
838
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K