Valence Bond question (Chemistry)

  • Thread starter Thread starter el_hijoeputa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond Chemistry
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the valence bond theory as it applies to the BH3 molecule, particularly focusing on the hybridization of boron and the role of its orbitals in bonding and energy level diagrams.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the fate of the third 2p orbital in BH3 and whether it should be classified as nonbonding in an energy level diagram. Participants explore the implications of hybridization and the role of remaining orbitals in bonding.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the classification of the third 2p orbital and its representation in energy level diagrams. Some guidance has been provided regarding the inclusion of this orbital in diagrams, and there is an acknowledgment of its potential role in ionization scenarios.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's uncertainty about how to represent the orbitals in diagrams, as well as the implications of ionization on the orbital's occupancy. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on these points without reaching a definitive conclusion.

el_hijoeputa
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm working a problem with the BH3 molecule. Therefore boron is 1s^2 2s^2 2p^1, and using the hypotetical method, it forms hybird sp2 orbitals. Promoting an electron to get 1s^2 2s^1 2p^2.

My question is that, it will form 3 bonding orbitals, one from the 1s and 2 from the 2p orbitals... what happends to the third 2p orbital? If I do an energy level diagram, do I have to list this orbital as a nonbonding one?

I posted this on the chemistry forum, but decided to post it here because there are more people visiting this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if you'd particularly list it as nonbinding or not, but yes, all the bonding when you have single bonds is done by hybrid orbitals (sp2); the leftover 2p orbital only has something to do if you have a double bond in the molecule. As it is, it'd just stick out perpendicular to the plane of the three sp2 orbitals.
 
So, should I listed in the VB energy level diagram for the BH3 molecule? In case it ionizes, gaining electrons... would they go to this nonbonding orbital?
 
If by the valence bond energy diagram you mean this kind of thing

_ _ _ _
_ _
_

and so forth, then yes, you should list the remaining 2p (it's going to be slightly higher than sp since sp is a combination of s and p, after all) in the diagram - not because it plays or doesn't play a role in bonding necessarily, though, but just because these diagrams show all the orbitals you have. check and add up your electrons to figure out if the orbital is filled or not, though.
 
Thanks Duarh, thank you very much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K