New Reply

Proof by contradiction - polynomials and infinite primes

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct3-11, 08:53 PM   #1
 

Proof by contradiction - polynomials and infinite primes


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Two Questions:

1. Prove, by contradiction, that if a and b are integers and b is odd,, then -1 is not a root of f(x)= ax^2+bx+a.

2. Prove, by contradiction, that there are infinitely many primes as follows. Assume that there only finite primes. Let P be the largest prime. Explain why there is a prime dividing P!+1 and find the the contradiction.

2. Relevant equations

For both, assume the contradiction work towards finding it is impossible.

3. The attempt at a solution

1. (x-1)(x-a)=ax^2+bx+a
Not sure where to go from there

2. This is not a normal infinite prime solutions as we have gone over a few of the solutions in class. I am not sure what she means by "there is a prime dividing P!+1" as that isn't really a clear sentence. Any Ideas?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Oct3-11, 10:03 PM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by bloynoys View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Two Questions:

1. Prove, by contradiction, that if a and b are integers and b is odd,, then -1 is not a root of f(x)= ax^2+bx+a.

2. Prove, by contradiction, that there are infinitely many primes as follows. Assume that there only finite primes. Let P be the largest prime. Explain why there is a prime dividing P!+1 and find the the contradiction.

2. Relevant equations

For both, assume the contradiction work towards finding it is impossible.

3. The attempt at a solution

1. (x-1)(x-a)=ax^2+bx+a
Not sure where to go from there
What does it mean for -1 to be a root of f?? What is the definition??

2. This is not a normal infinite prime solutions as we have gone over a few of the solutions in class. I am not sure what she means by "there is a prime dividing P!+1" as that isn't really a clear sentence. Any Ideas?
What's wrong with that sentence?? "There is a prime number that divides P!+1" is a perfectly good sentence...
Oct3-11, 10:16 PM   #3
 
Maybe I am just confused to how to relate the P!+1 to P. Is it P/(P!+1)? Or (P!+1)/P and that just eliminates the "largest prime?" So it is the second largest prime plus one?

And for the first one, a root means that it is one of the solutions to an equation. I realize this looks dumb as this is an easyish problem, but we are working on this in a high level undergrad math course. I am just drawing a blank on the intermediate steps to set these problems up. Oh and I believe I made a mistake. It should read:

(x+1)(x+a)=ax^2+bx+a correct?
Oct3-11, 10:18 PM   #4
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

Proof by contradiction - polynomials and infinite primes


Quote by bloynoys View Post
Maybe I am just confused to how to relate the P!+1 to P. Is it P/(P!+1)? Or (P!+1)/P and that just eliminates the "largest prime?" So it is the second largest prime plus one?
You're making this far too difficult. For example, let P=3, then P!+1=7. So a prime that divides P!+1 is 7.

In general, there is always a prime that divides P!+1 for any P.

And for the first one, a root means that it is one of the solutions to an equation. I realize this looks dumb as this is an easyish problem, but we are working on this in a high level undergrad math course. I am just drawing a blank on the intermediate steps to set these problems up. Oh and I believe I made a mistake. It should read:

(x+1)(x+a)=ax^2+bx+a correct?
-1 being a root means that f(-1)=0 right? Now write out the definition of f and see what it gives you.
Oct3-11, 10:26 PM   #5
 
Wow, holy cow, that was a whole lot easier than I thought for the first one. I just had my head focused in on a multiple root function and didn't think about the f(x)=0. Thank you for that!

And wow on the second one as well. She basically spelled out the definition of prime numbers, and then added one. It was the word dividing that had me confused. I knew they weren't as hard as I was making them but wow, I really shouldn't overlook stuff like that.

Thank you for all your help!
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Proof by contradiction - polynomials and infinite primes
Thread Forum Replies
Euler's proof of infinite primes and his product formula. General Math 9
Infinite number of primes? General Math 8
Euclid Proof of Infinite Primes General Math 7
infinite primes? Linear & Abstract Algebra 8
Infinite primes using Quadratic Residues Linear & Abstract Algebra 1