Why can you see white through H-alpha filter?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter smithpa9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the observation of white spots, referred to as Plagues, seen through a Hydrogen-alpha (H-alpha) filtered telescope, specifically questioning how these white areas can appear when the filter is designed to only allow red light at a wavelength of 656.3nm. Participants explore the implications of visual perception, photographic techniques, and the nature of light intensity in relation to H-alpha observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the H-alpha filter should only allow red light, leading to confusion about the appearance of white spots in images.
  • One participant suggests that high intensity of light in photographs may render as lighter colors, potentially appearing white, while lower intensity appears darker.
  • Another participant questions whether the images are black and white photographs or color photographs, noting that the development process could affect the final appearance.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of 'false color' reproductions being used in solar imaging to enhance visual appeal.
  • There is speculation about the human visual system's processing of light, suggesting that perception of white could involve stimulation of different cone cells in the retina.
  • One participant proposes that the intensity of light could lead to a paler appearance, potentially resulting in white under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that true white should not be visible through the H-alpha filter, but they have differing views on the mechanisms behind the appearance of white in photographs and through the eyepiece. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact reasons for this phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on photographic techniques and the variability in human visual perception, which may not be fully understood in the context of narrowband filtering.

smithpa9
Messages
40
Reaction score
23
I recently bought a Hydrogen-alpha filtered telescope (Coronado PST). Looking through it, the Sun looks mostly red as expected since the H-alpha filter only let's through visible light at a wavelength of exactly 656.3nm which is in the red part of the spectrum.

And I can see both lighter and darker red in places (filaments are darker), which I assume reflects the intensity of the light (not a different wavelength).

What I haven't seen yet, but have seen in many H-alpha pictures, are white spots called Plagues.

My question is, how is it possible to see anything white (or any other color for that matter, other than red) through a filter that only let's through red light?

Still sleepless in Cincinnati
:bugeye:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Your question answers the question - you can only see red because the filter only let's through red.
 
Russ. . . read the question more carefully.

I'm asking why it is possible to see WHITE in pictures taken through a RED (H-alpha) filter. You should only see RED. I see such pictures all the time. Usually the white area is a solar flare or plague, whereas filaments appear darker red. I heard from someone on another board that the answer is that photographically a high INTENSITY of light will be rendered as lighter on the picture and low intensity as darker, although both at the red wavelength. At the extreme, those would look white and black. Also, some solar photographers enhance the colors of their pictures a bit and may add that whiteness. Sounded plausible. Thanks anyway.
 
Are you asking about black and white photographs or color ones?

The image will depend in the wavelength of light and the emulsion which is exposed to produce the picture. Is the picture developed from the filtered sunlight directly or is it a negative which is then processed using some secondary light source (i.e. not sunlight, or H-radiation)?

What one's eyes sees is different from what is produced through photography. Also, could you be looking at 'false color' reproductions?
 
Thanks Astronuc!

I'm asking about color photographs I see in textbooks, magazines, and on the internet. So, I'm not sure on any of them how the picture was taken, or developed.

I'm guessing any and all of the things you mention could be the culprit depending on what picture I'm looking at. And it sounds like you and Russ agree that visually, I should never see true white through the eyepiece with a H-alpha filter. Only in pictures. That makes sense now.

Thank you both.

Paul
 
IIRC, the H alpha photos you see in books and on the web are not 'colour photos' of the family holidays kind. A 'photo' taken through a narrowband filter can only 'truthfully' be printed as black and white; however, to make these look sexier, publishers 'adjust' them - the most 'truthful' adjustment is to give the B&W image a colour that's the same as the wavelength of the filter (doesn't work for IR or UV filters of course). However, these aren't very interesting looking, so the images have the saturation stretched, and when that happens the most intense parts become 'white'.

Another trick is to use two 'colours', say red and yellow, with yellow for high intensity (and white for the most intense) parts of the image.
 
Nereid said:
IIRC, the H alpha photos you see in books and on the web are not 'colour photos' of the family holidays kind. A 'photo' taken through a narrowband filter can only 'truthfully' be printed as black and white; however, to make these look sexier, publishers 'adjust' them - the most 'truthful' adjustment is to give the B&W image a colour that's the same as the wavelength of the filter (doesn't work for IR or UV filters of course). However, these aren't very interesting looking, so the images have the saturation stretched, and when that happens the most intense parts become 'white'.

Another trick is to use two 'colours', say red and yellow, with yellow for high intensity (and white for the most intense) parts of the image.
If that is the case, then why do we ( I ) see a lot of white when looking through a PST (the small 40mm one) and even more white when using a larger Coronado solar Ha scope? Happens all the time.
 
Very good question Labguy!

Let's assume that the filters do indeed allow only a very narrow range of frequencies (wavelengths) through, and that these are just in the 'red' part of the spectrum.

If that's the case, then your perception of 'white' cannot be simply a mix of wavelengths incident on your retina, so either the G and B cones are being excited, or some other part(s) of the human visual system - deeper towards, or in - the brain are doing some interesting processing (or both). While G cones are sensitive (just) to the Ha wavelength, the rest of the human visual system makes the appropriate adjustment.

Maybe it's an intensity effect? If you (one) look at the world through a narrow-band (deep) blue filter, do you also perceive 'white'? What happens in the middle of the 'green' (G cones have a peak sensitivity of approx 535 nm)?
 
Nereid said:
Very good question Labguy!

Let's assume that the filters do indeed allow only a very narrow range of frequencies (wavelengths) through, and that these are just in the 'red' part of the spectrum.

If that's the case, then your perception of 'white' cannot be simply a mix of wavelengths incident on your retina, so either the G and B cones are being excited, or some other part(s) of the human visual system - deeper towards, or in - the brain are doing some interesting processing (or both). While G cones are sensitive (just) to the Ha wavelength, the rest of the human visual system makes the appropriate adjustment.

Maybe it's an intensity effect? If you (one) look at the world through a narrow-band (deep) blue filter, do you also perceive 'white'? What happens in the middle of the 'green' (G cones have a peak sensitivity of approx 535 nm)?
Here is a new one:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap041206.html
That is exactly how it looks through a good Ha filter. Notice the white areas. This is a photo, but it looks the same to the eye at an eyepiece, white included.
 
  • #10
Looks like an intensity effect of some kind, don't you think? As the amount of light (from a region) increases, it gets paler, until it becomes 'white'?

In principle, this should be easy enough to test; in practice I'm not sure you could get a bright enough light - the headlights of your car?

I like the date on this APOD (27 December 2004)!

Edit: looks like the 'author' did some http://www.sungazer.net/ccdprocess.html to produce the final image, including "Next, under Image | Adjustments | Levels, I’ll adjust the mid-tone point slider to darken the disk detail and then the white point slider to brighten any active regions."
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K