| New Reply |
Ehrenfest theorem |
Share Thread |
| Oct26-11, 10:48 AM | #1 |
|
|
Ehrenfest theorem
Might be trivial, but: In deriving it, I don't understand how the minus sign comes in to establish the [H,A] commutator. (it seems to me that both partial derivatives of ψ should come out positive)
For example, in http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bds10/...t_operator.pdf on page 5. |
| Oct26-11, 02:16 PM | #2 |
|
|
Search for the G. Frieseke's article on arxiv.org. That's the proof for general self-adjoint operators.
|
| Oct26-11, 02:19 PM | #3 |
|
|
Lol, those are my lecture notes.
The minus sign is there because you have the i inside the bra and so when you take its complex conjugate you get a -i. |
| Oct26-11, 05:15 PM | #4 |
|
|
Ehrenfest theorem |
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Ehrenfest theorem
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Ehrenfest theorem | Quantum Physics | 19 | ||
| Ehrenfest's Theorem | Quantum Physics | 1 | ||
| Ehrenfest's Theorem | Quantum Physics | 8 | ||
| Ehrenfest's Theorem | Quantum Physics | 6 | ||
| Ehrenfest's Theorem | Quantum Physics | 4 | ||