Does this model of the casimir effect extracting energy have flaws?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a proposed method to convert the Casimir effect into usable energy through a rotating drum system with magnetized plates. The system aims to generate heat via the magnetocaloric effect as the plates pass close together and then cool down when they separate. However, skepticism arises regarding the actual heat production, as the expected energy conversion may not be feasible. A response dismisses the proposal as scientifically flawed, indicating that the concepts presented lack coherence and validity. Overall, the feasibility of the energy extraction method is heavily questioned.
clearwater304
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a project in thermodynamics and after seeing the movie "atlas shrugged" tryed determining a method to convert the casimir effect into usable energy.

My system would have a rotating drum inside of a cylinder, with plates on the sides of the drum and the cylinder. The normal function of this system would be to produce heat and pump the water. I would expect each time the plates pass close to each other, they would become magnetized due to the casimir effect. This would cuase the plates to heat up due to the magnetocaloric effect. When the plates move away from each other, they would cool down due the magnetocaloric effect, making the heat produced essentially null. However, the plates would not normally completely demagnetize, yet the heat from the water will cuase it to lose hysteresis. This loss in hysterisis should produce extra heat in the system. This cycle should completely turn the energy stored from the casimir effect, to heat due to the magnetocaloric effect.

I'm very skeptical this system would produce much heat, but I saw this video on youtube and it seams to be the exact same system, in which he claims, produces more heat. Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this system?

[Crackpot link deleted]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Nothing you wrote is correct. It's a string of scientific words placed together in a seemingly random order. Thread closed.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top