Does Phase Space Explain Entropy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between phase space and the concept of entropy, particularly in the context of statistical physics and thermodynamics. Participants explore whether understanding phase space is essential for grasping entropy, referencing Penrose's work and historical perspectives on the development of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that phase space is not absolutely necessary to understand entropy, suggesting alternative perspectives on the topic.
  • Others propose that entropy is fundamentally tied to statistical physics rather than thermodynamics, raising questions about the historical development of these theories.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the chronological relationship between thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, questioning which came first and how they relate to the definition of entropy.
  • Another participant asserts that statistical mechanics can derive principles of thermodynamics, indicating a belief in the foundational role of statistical mechanics in understanding entropy.
  • Some participants acknowledge their limited understanding of phase space and its implications, indicating a need for further clarification on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessity of phase space for understanding entropy, with multiple competing views presented regarding the relationship between thermodynamics and statistical mechanics.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the historical precedence of thermodynamics versus statistical mechanics and the implications of this relationship for the understanding of entropy. Additionally, some participants express uncertainty about the concept of phase space itself.

celal777
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I just read Penrose's explanation of entropy in his book "The
Emperor's New Mind". His explanation is completely saturated in an
extended discussion of "phase space" . Is this concept of "phase
space" absolutely necessary in order to explain or understand
entropy ?

Celal
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The short answer to your questions is "No, it it not absolutely necessary!"

I haven't read Penrose's "The Emperor's New Mind" so I don't know exactly what he's doing and why. However, I am looking forward to his new book "The Road to Reality : A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe" due out in February.
 
Last edited:
Tide said:
The short answer to your questions is "No, it it not absolutel necessary!"

I haven't read Penrose's "The Emperor's New Mind" so I don't know exactly what he's doing and why. However, I am looking forward to his new book "The Road to Reality : A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe" due out in February.

Depends on how rigurous u want to be.The concept of entropy really belongs to statistical physics,and not to thermodynamics.As each theory is presented 2 distinct (logically equivalent) formulations,i guess it all depends on how rigurous u want to be.If u're one Penrose kind (and i'd like to think of myself being so (theory inclined)),u couldn't conceive the notion of entropy without abstract separable Hilbert spaces and the phase space.

Daniel,

reccomending u read "Emperor's new mind".

EDIT:Sorry for the repetition.I could have found other words,not the same.
 
dextercioby said:
The concept of entropy really belongs to statistical physics,and not to thermodynamics.

I'm not sure about that. What was the first? Thermodynamics or Statiscal Mechanics? When Clausius formulated the second principle the Entropy function was well defined yet, and it had completeness and a meaning, wasn't it?

I'm confused about that, I'm not stating what I've posted at all. Anybody could clear it up?
 
Clausius2 said:
I'm not sure about that. What was the first? Thermodynamics or Statiscal Mechanics? When Clausius formulated the second principle the Entropy function was well defined yet, and it had completeness and a meaning, wasn't it?

I'm confused about that, I'm not stating what I've posted at all. Anybody could clear it up?


My friend,history of science is one thing,logical relations among theories in science are another.
There would not have been statistical thermodynamics (thermodynamics of statistical systems) without prior knowledge and notions/concepts form thermodynamics.That's history.Yet,thermodynamics as a whole is a subtheory of statistical mechanics.Every principle of thermodynamics can be thoroughly derived from the laws of classical/quantum SM.That's science.

Proof of my statements can be given if one is considering SM in the microcanonical ensemble and classical thermodynamics of reversible phenomena in the Neogibbsian formulation.
Your postulate of Clausius can be proved via Boltzmann equation.

Daniel.

PS.I loved your exposure on "swirling water while draining".YOU'RE A MASTER.
 
dextercioby said:
My friend,history of science is one thing,logical relations among theories in science are another.
There would not have been statistical thermodynamics (thermodynamics of statistical systems) without prior knowledge and notions/concepts form thermodynamics.That's history.Yet,thermodynamics as a whole is a subtheory of statistical mechanics.Every principle of thermodynamics can be thoroughly derived from the laws of classical/quantum SM.That's science.

Proof of my statements can be given if one is considering SM in the microcanonical ensemble and classical thermodynamics of reversible phenomena in the Neogibbsian formulation.
Your postulate of Clausius can be proved via Boltzmann equation.

Daniel.

PS.I loved your exposure on "swirling water while draining".YOU'RE A MASTER.

:blushing: :blushing: Thanks Daniel, I love you too :!) :smile: :cool: .

Well, to say the truth I have NO idea about phase space. In fact I only know a bit about Kinetic Theory. Maybe I didn't go to class that day... :biggrin: . I have nothing to say, you know more about this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K