What are the steps to calculate uncertainty in quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating uncertainty in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the mathematical aspects of applying quantum mechanical operators and normalizing wave functions. The original poster expresses difficulty due to a lack of mathematical background, particularly in the context of physical chemistry.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of quantum mechanical operators to specific functions and the normalization of a wave function. There are attempts to derive the normalization constant and questions about the correctness of integrals involved in the process.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the mathematical operations required, including the definitions of operators and normalization conditions. There is an ongoing exploration of the normalization constant and the integration process, with multiple interpretations being considered. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify mathematical concepts without reaching a consensus on the final calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges posed by the mathematical complexity of the integrals involved in quantum mechanics, as well as the original poster's limited mathematical background. There is mention of the need for a list of useful integrations for future reference, indicating constraints in the original poster's preparation for the course.

jsundberg
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I'm currently enrolled in a course about physical chemistry. Being a chemist in ground, I do not have much previous mathemathical education and this have now become a problem. People have told me that math isn't really that necessary for this course, but I can see now that we have come to quantum mechanics that I really should have read some more math before. Anyway, not much I can do now and I ask for your help. :)

I have 2 questions I need help with, and I would be really glad if you could help me out. It's mostly mathemathical at this point. And maybe I should point out that my mother language is not english, so I may get some things weird/wrong.

1) Apply the quantum mechanical operators of x, p, p^2 on each of the following functions: x^2, exp(ikx), exp(-ax^2).

2) Look at a particle in one dimension, x, in the interval 0<x<1. The wave function that describes the particle is psi(x) = sin(pi*x) in the interval and zero outside.

a: Normalize the wave function
b: Calculate the uncertainty (Heisenberg's) - deltaXdeltaP

Any hints, tips, help would be the best. Many thanks.
:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you should know for this question is that the operator x simply multiplies the function by x and that the operator p differentiates the function with respect to x and multiplies it by [itex]\frac{\hbar}{i}[/itex].
So

[tex]x(f(x))=xf(x)[/tex]
[tex]p(f(x))=\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{df(x)}{dx}[/tex]

For 2). A wavefunction [itex]\psi(x)[/itex] is normalised if
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|\psi(x)|^2dx=1[/tex]
 
Thanks!

I've thinkered a little about number 2, and my conclusion follows -
The integral is: F(x) = x/2 - (sin(2*pi*x)/4*pi) = 1/N^2
And the normalization constant becomes: (1/(x/2 - (sin(2*pi*x)/4*pi))^1/2)
In other words, the normalized wave function should be:
(1/(x/2 - (sin(2*pi*x)/4*pi))^1/2)*sin(pi*x)

Is this correct?
The integral was looked up in a table, is this integral solved easily by partial integration otherwise?
 
jsundberg said:
Thanks!

I've thinkered a little about number 2, and my conclusion follows -
The integral is: F(x) = x/2 - (sin(2*pi*x)/4*pi) = 1/N^2
And the normalization constant becomes: (1/(x/2 - (sin(2*pi*x)/4*pi))^1/2)
In other words, the normalized wave function should be:
(1/(x/2 - (sin(2*pi*x)/4*pi))^1/2)*sin(pi*x)

Is this correct?
The integral was looked up in a table, is this integral solved easily by partial integration otherwise?

There's something wrong with the constant od normalization.As Galileo said,apply that formula knowing that your function (sin) is real (so that should make an idea about that square) and that the domain of integrating (-infinty+plus infinity) is devisedin 3 parts:the (-inf,0)(0,1) and (1,+inf).For the integration u need,u won't be needing a table of integrals,unless u're really slow (sorry,no offense).

Good luck,anyway!
 
Yes, that was quite messed up. :/

Got more help from my intelligent friend who helped me out to understand and guided me trough the problem. So the final word is that the nomralization constant is 2^(1/2) which give s the normalized function as 2^(1/2)sin(pi*x)

Does this sound more correct?
And I am really slow. :D The problem is that I have no mathemathical background, but my friend who isn't really slow when it comes to mathemathics sais that he would need ****loads of time to do the integration of |sin(pi*x)|^2 and he seems right, or?

Thanks for all the help, I really appreciate it!
 
Last edited:
jsundberg said:
Yes, that was quite messed up. :/

Got more help from my intelligent friend who helped me out to understand and guided me trough the problem. So the final word is that the nomralization constant is 2^(1/2) which give s the normalized function as 2^(1/2)sin(pi*x)

Does this sound more correct?
And I am really slow. :D The problem is that I have no mathemathical background, but my friend who isn't really slow when it comes to mathemathics sais that he would need ****loads of time to do the integration of |sin(pi*x)|^2 and he seems right, or?

Thanks for all the help, I really appreciate it!

Integrals with product of sines or cosines can be a a big pain. Lots of work. Always try to look for symmetry or things that can make you see the answer beforehand. You don't want to integrate for 15 minutes only to find out the answer is zero and saying: 'Gee, the function is odd, I should've seen it coming'.

You usually have to use some trig. identity for these integrals. The following is handy for sine squared::
[tex]\sin^2(x)=\frac{1}{2}(1-\cos(2x))[/tex]

In this case you can also do it by noticing

[tex]\int_0^1\sin^2(\pi x)dx=\int_0^1\cos^2(\pi x)dx[/tex]
Since the integration covers a whole period.
Then combine this with [itex]\sin^2x+\cos^2x=1[/itex]

[tex]1=\int_0^1(\sin^2(\pi x)+\cos^2(\pi x))dx=2\int_0^1 \sin^2(\pi x)dx[/tex]
To get [itex]\int_0^1 \sin^2(\pi x)dx=1/2[/itex].

Anyway, you got the right answer. :wink:
 
Last edited:
Thanks! :)
I think we will get a small list of useful integrations for the final test, since the mathematics is a bit beyond scope of this course.

Anyway, I need some more help with the math when I should calculate the uncertainty product.

I have understood that this is done by calculating deltaX*deltaP, and deltaX^2/P^2 = <x^2>/<p^2>. Put this in the wave function:
<x^2> = int dx x^2|f(x)|^2 = 2^1/2int dx x^2sin(pi*x)sin(pi*x)

But here I get stuck, and I can't get hold of my friend. :D
 
jsundberg said:
Thanks! :)
I think we will get a small list of useful integrations for the final test, since the mathematics is a bit beyond scope of this course.

Anyway, I need some more help with the math when I should calculate the uncertainty product.

I have understood that this is done by calculating deltaX*deltaP, and deltaX^2/P^2 = <x^2>/<p^2>. Put this in the wave function:
<x^2> = int dx x^2|f(x)|^2 = 2^1/2int dx x^2sin(pi*x)sin(pi*x)

But here I get stuck, and I can't get hold of my friend. :D

I think u mean Galileo,but let me be a substitute for him,his knowledge and his ability to give (useful) advice. :wink:

U have determined the eigenfunction [itex]\psi (x)[/itex],together with its normalization factor,which became the key issue for this thread.
Now,u wish to calculate the quantities [itex]\Delta x,\Delta p_{x}[/itex],multiply them to check whether Heisenberg's famous uncertainty relation is satisfied.But u're facing some rather nasty integrals.Lemme explain u why.Textbook definitons:
[tex](\Delta x)_{\psi(x)} =:+\sqrt{< \hat{x}^{2}>_{\psi(x)} -<\hat{x}>_{\psi(x)} ^{2}}[/tex]
[tex](\Delta p_{x})_{\psi(x)} =:+\sqrt{<\hat{p}^{2}_{x}>_{\psi(x)}-<\hat{p}_{x}>_{\psi(x)}^{2}}[/tex]

In the coordinate representation:
[tex]\hat{x}=x\hat{1}[/tex]
[tex]\hat{p}_{x}=-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}\hat{1}[/tex]

So,u'll have to find those averages (4 of them),where the abstract [itex]\psi(x)[/itex] is nothing than your normalized wave function.
I know these QM calculations seem horrible,but u cannot state a sound answer to your problem without making the calculations.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K