Which Bulb Shines Brighter: X or Y?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DeathKnight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brightness Bulb
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of two light bulbs, X and Y, focusing on their filament characteristics—specifically, the thickness and length of the filaments—and how these factors influence the brightness of the bulbs when connected to a power supply. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, mathematical reasoning, and conceptual clarifications related to electrical resistance and power dissipation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that bulb Y, with its thinner and longer filament, will shine brighter due to higher resistance leading to greater energy dissipation.
  • Others argue that if both bulbs are connected at the same voltage, the bulb with the shorter and thicker filament (bulb X) will have lower resistance and thus will emit more power, contradicting the initial claim.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between resistance and energy conversion, seeking clarification on how lower resistance might affect energy dissipation in practical terms.
  • Another participant introduces hypothetical scenarios to illustrate the extremes of filament resistance, suggesting that very high resistance would lead to negligible current and thus minimal light output.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of connecting the bulbs in series versus parallel, with some participants noting that the configuration affects the power calculations and light intensity comparisons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus. There are competing views regarding which bulb will shine brighter based on the characteristics of their filaments and the conditions of their connection to the power supply. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple interpretations of the physics involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants assume ideal conditions for the filaments and the power supply, but there are limitations in their assumptions regarding efficiency and the nature of electrical flow (constant voltage vs. constant current). Some mathematical steps and definitions remain unresolved, contributing to the confusion expressed by participants.

DeathKnight
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
We have two bulbs, X and Y. Y has thinner and longer filament than X. When connected to a power supply which bulb will give out most light and why? I think the answer should be Y as it has heigher resistance and therefore will dissipate more energy.
Thanks in advance. :approve:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
DeathKnight said:
We have two bulbs, X and Y. Y has thinner and longer filament than X. When connected to a power supply which bulb will give out most light and why? I think the answer should be Y as it has heigher resistance and therefore will dissipate more energy.
Thanks in advance. :approve:

Energy absorbed:W=UIt.Energy emitted (light energy) W_{emitted}=\eta W.
Assume the 2 bulb are connected at the same tension U.Then,assuming by absurdum that the bulbs have the same effieciency of converting electric energy into light energy,then your discussion should stick with comparing the intensities.And from that respect,i think your conclusion is wrong.

Daniel.
 
Well thanks for your reply but I'm afraid I didnt get a single thing. Can you please explain this in simple 10th grade physics. My teacher said the same thing. He proved it by using the equation P=V^2/R (where, I believe, P is rate of dissipation of energy).
So does it mean the tungsten filament in the bulb has extremely less resistance? If that's the case then anything with low resistance should convert more electrical energy into other forms of energy? Man, I'm confused!
I'll be gateful to anybody who explains it and correct me or even tries to do so.
Thanks
 
Last edited:
DeathKnight said:
Well thanks for your reply but I'm afraid I didnt get a single thing. Can you please explain this in simple 10th grade physics. My teacher said the same thing. He proved it by using the equation P=V^2/R (where, I believe, P is rate of dissipation of energy).
So does it mean the tungsten filament in the bulb has extremely less resistance? If that's the case then anything with low resistance should convert more electrical energy into other forms of energy? Man, I'm confused!
I'll be gateful to anybody who explains it and correct me or even tries to do so.
Thanks

Let's supersimplify things.I'm assuming that the 2 filaments are connected in a circuit and the difference of potential between the ends of the filaments are kept constant at,let's say,a common value U.Assume your filaments are made from the same material (if u want,tungsten/wolfram),so we shouldn't worry about different internal processes.Assume that the filaments are ideal,that is they convert all the electric energy absorbed from the circuit into electric energy.U know that the resitance is proportional with the length of the conductor/filament and inverse proportional with the area of a transverse section made through the conductor.
So it means that the bulb with the shorter and thicker filament will have a smaller resistance.
Since u assumed all the above,u have to compare the powers (energies emitted in each second) for each bulb.Since for both bulbs u have to apply the same formula P=UI=U^2/R.
So u write for the first bulb (X):P_{X}=U^2/R_{X}.
For the second (Y):P_{Y}=U^2/R_{Y}.

From prior assumption,u have found that R_{X}<R_{Y},so that should mean:
P_{X}>P_{Y}.So the X bulb will radiate more energy.

Daniel.
 
Ummm. Do you mean that the two bulbs are connected one at a time, or both together in series? (If they're connected in parallel, that's the same as one at a time).

OK, the rest of this post assumes the 'one at a time' or parallel wired case.

Now think of a filament that's really long - say ten miles. And really thin too, so that it's resistance is like 10 million mega-ohms. Now this filament will conduct hardly any current, so there will be hardly any power flow, and it won't shine at all.

Take it to the other extreme and have a filament with a resistance of 0.00001 ohms. Now with a 10 volt perfect battery (and perfect wiring to the bulb, like they always have in these physics questions) then you'd get about a million amps flowing, so the power dissipated in the bulb would be ten million watts. I think that would shine more than the long spindly filament job.
 
ceptimus said:
Ummm. Do you mean that the two bulbs are connected one at a time, or both together in series? (If they're connected in parallel, that's the same as one at a time).

OK, the rest of this post assumes the 'one at a time' or parallel wired case.

Obviously in parallel connected so he can look at both at the time and compare the intensities of light emitted.One at a time,should require some larger gap between the resistances.
The case in series connection,he would find more useful the other formula:
P=RI^2,since the intensity is the same through every bulb.And again,series connection would mean putting the bulbs in the same circuit and use the eye to compare the light intensities,and the formula to check whether the sight is wrong. :-p
 
DeathKnight said:
Well thanks for your reply but I'm afraid I didnt get a single thing. Can you please explain this in simple 10th grade physics. My teacher said the same thing. He proved it by using the equation P=V^2/R (where, I believe, P is rate of dissipation of energy).
So does it mean the tungsten filament in the bulb has extremely less resistance? If that's the case then anything with low resistance should convert more electrical energy into other forms of energy? Man, I'm confused!
I'll be gateful to anybody who explains it and correct me or even tries to do so.
Thanks
Questions like this are confusing because your instinct is to think of a steady flow of electricity. Then it is agreed that the higher resistance has more dissipated power. That's called "constant current" case.

But batteries and house electricity don't work that way. They operate at "constant voltage". It's like a constant force, causing the higher resistance case to pass far less electricity (I mean current).

Think of a car battery. Short it with a thick copper wire and the wire will melt in an instant. (OK, on second thought, don't try it; just imagine it.) That's a lot of power; because the resistance is very low. Now connect a small light bulb. No melting because the resistance is very high.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
29K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
15K
Replies
11
Views
2K