Is Space Possible Without Matter?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter derekmohammed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of space in relation to the presence of matter, particularly in a hypothetical scenario involving a large box with a perfect vacuum. Participants explore whether space can exist without matter, the implications of electric fields in a vacuum, and the nature of electromagnetic phenomena in such conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assertion that space only exists in the presence of matter, with one referencing Ernst Mach's ideas on centrifugal forces and the universe's influence.
  • There is a proposal that if space lacks standardized units, it may depend on matter's presence, leading to inquiries about the behavior of electric fields and the appearance of particles in a vacuum.
  • A participant challenges the mechanism of running an electric current through the box without injecting electrons, prompting clarification that an electric field was intended instead.
  • Another participant asserts that if the box is an insulator, no electric field would exist within it, while also noting that the box itself is made of matter, which contains electrons.
  • One participant argues that electromagnetic fields can exist in the box regardless of the presence of matter, and that vacuum does not alter the fundamental properties of space.
  • Virtual particles are mentioned as continuing to appear and disappear in the vacuum, suggesting that space has properties independent of massive bodies.
  • A recommendation is made to read Brian Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos" for further insights on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether space can exist without matter, with some arguing for the necessity of matter while others contend that space and electromagnetic phenomena can exist independently. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants explore various assumptions about the nature of space, the role of matter, and the behavior of electric fields in a vacuum, but do not reach a consensus on these points.

derekmohammed
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
This is my first post here and I am not quite sure if this is the right place to put this post but here it goes anyway...

It is said that space only exists in the presence of matter. IF this is true what would happen in the following situation...

Let us say we have a box with incredibly large dimensions and infinitely strong sides. Inside this box there is a perfectly uniform vacuum, in which there are no atoms or any other particles are inside the box. Is it possible to say that since there is no matter inside the enormous box that there is no space inside the box? (Not sure if there would be "no Space" in the middle area or uniformly throughout?) And if there is space could we consider those units to be the standard units of space, if there is such thing?

And Finally... If we were to run an electric current through the box would electrons and positrons appear? IF so were do they come from?

Thanks a lot.

Derek Mohammed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer to your question is no. We exist in the spacetime of our universe and as far as we know there is no escaping it.

Who says that space only exists in the presence of matter?

Ernst Mach once commented that we only experience centrifugal [I think he said fugal and not petal] forces because the rest of the universe exists [which is another discussion], but your quote is new to me.
 
Last edited:
The way I thought of it was if space does not have some standerdized units then it must depend on the presence of matter. But what would happen with the electric field, would electrons and positrons appear in the vacuum?
 
"If we were to run an electric current through the box would electrons and positrons appear? IF so were do they come from? "

By what mechanism do you propose to run current through the box *without* injecting electrons?
 
Ahh I see, I meant to say pass an electric field through the box, not current... (please note I am in my second year of university (physics/mathematics) and my knowledge of eltricricity is limited...
 
If the box does not allow electrons to pass though it, then it is an insulator. There will be no field within it. And yes, vacuum is an excellent insulator.

BTW, note that, vacuum or no, and very large size or no, the box is still made from atoms and molecules that contain electrons - all of which are capable of providing electrons or electron holes as much as any other material. There is no reason why the box would not behave exactly as any old box (or vacuum tube) filled with vacuum would behave.


However my overriding point would be aimed at the original premise. Who says you can only have space in the presence of matter?
 
You have done nothing to exclude Electromagnetic fields from existing inside of your box. Numerous phenomena associated with space/time will occur inside the box. It will be at some temperature so there is thermal electromagnetic energy. The fundamental electrical properties of free space will be unchanged therefore Electromagnetic fields which do not require the existence of matter to propagate, will be able to pass through the space in the box. In addition virtual particles will continue to pop into and out of existence inside the box. There is more to space time then the presence or absence of massive bodies. Evacuating a box does nothing to alter space.
 
I recommend reading Brian Green's Fabric of the Cosmos, he covers that very topic very well.
 
mathlete said:
Brian Green's Fabric of the Cosmos

Want for Christmas please!

If it's half as good as The Elegant Universe, it'll be fantastic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
895
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K