Thread Closed

Transformer efficiency at low (and high) frequencies

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Dec15-04, 09:53 AM   #1
 

Transformer efficiency at low (and high) frequencies


Hello,

I've been thinking about why (elementary) transformer efficiency drops drastically at very low frequencies. I know hysteresis effects play a major role in reducing efficiency at high frequencies, but why low? I realise that as we reduce the frequency of the emf, we're making the circuit "more and more DC", but a freqency still exists, no? The transformer that I'm talking about is a simple two-solenoids-magnetically-linked-by-a-ferromagnetic-core single phase one (home-made). Any help would be greatly appreciated.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
engineering news on PhysOrg.com

>> Army ground combat systems adopts tool for choosing future warfighting vehicles
>> Company pioneering new types of material for 3-D printer 'ink'
>> Student-built innovations to help improve and save lives
Dec15-04, 08:44 PM   #2
 
>I realise that as we reduce the frequency of the emf, we're making the circuit "more and more DC"...

You've basically answered your own question.
The phenomenon of mutual induction (a.k.a. back EMF) between conductors in a transformer (or motor) winding is what limits the current. A very large utility distribution transformer will have 735 Kv on a primary winding of only a few ohms resistance. (0 ohms if they could make it). The equipment is designed to work efficiently on 60 Hz.
Another example is an adjustable frequency motor drive. As the frequency is reduced, so is the voltage. Otherwise the current would be excessive and burn the motor out.
Dec16-04, 12:04 AM   #3
 
What are the pros/cons of 60Hz and (what was it) 440Hz?
Dec16-04, 10:32 AM   #4
 

Transformer efficiency at low (and high) frequencies


The phenomenon of mutual induction (a.k.a. back EMF) between conductors in a transformer (or motor) winding is what limits the current. A very large utility distribution transformer will have 735 Kv on a primary winding of only a few ohms resistance. (0 ohms if they could make it). The equipment is designed to work efficiently on 60 Hz.
Another example is an adjustable frequency motor drive. As the frequency is reduced, so is the voltage. Otherwise the current would be excessive and burn the motor out.
Wow, that seems logical. Thank you so much.
Dec16-04, 09:48 PM   #5
 
Quote by Arctic Fox
What are the pros/cons of 60Hz and (what was it) 440Hz?
Almost all motors and power transformers use a core of laminated steel to conduct magnetism. The iron molecules line up according to the direction of the magnetic lines, which is decided by the electrical polarity. There's a slight hesitation of the molecules to follow the (constantly reversing) magnetism called hysteresis, which is energy loss. At 60 Hz the loss is small but increases with frequency.
A 2 pole induction motor will spin at 3500 rpm at 60 Hz so 400 Hz is used to run special motors at higher speeds. For even higher frequencies into the MHz range, ferrite is used in place of iron.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Transformer efficiency at low (and high) frequencies
Thread Forum Replies
Efficiency of RWD vs. AWD at high speed Mechanical Engineering 37
modulation in high frequencies and antennas Electrical Engineering 5
High Frequencies in Computer CPUs General Physics 21
Looking for a super high-efficiency air pump General Engineering 20