## Commutators of vector operators

I've been trying to work out some expressions involving commutators of vector operators, and I am hoping some of y'all might know some identities that might make my job a little easier.

Specifically, what is $\left[\mathbf{\hat A}\cdot\mathbf{\hat B}, \mathbf{\hat C}\right]$? Are there any useful identities to express this in terms of simpler commutators?

Any help is appreciated.
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> New language discovery reveals linguistic insights>> US official: Solar plane to help ground energy use (Update)>> Four microphones, computer algorithm enough to produce 3-D model of simple, convex room
 Are you sure you mean a "vector operator", typically we talk about matrix operators when discussing the commutator relationships (or group elements in a more general setting). Vector operator: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_operator However, your question is straightforward, [S,T] = ST - TS (by definition) Start with [AB,C] = ABC - CAB (+ ACB - ACB ) = ABC - ACB + ACB - CAB = A(BC - CB) + (AC - CA)B = A[B,C] + [A,C]B Therefore we conclude [AB,C] = A[B,C] + [A,C]B to be an identity. Does that answer your question.... you could have looked anywhere on the internet to get this.... so I'm guessing this isn't what you want.
 You can also construct an identity using the so called anti-commutator: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Anticommutator.html You should probably do this for practice.

## Commutators of vector operators

I would think that you should define $[{\bf{\hat S}},{\bf{\hat T}}] = {\bf{\hat S}} \cdot {\bf{\hat T}} - {\bf{\hat T}} \cdot {\bf{\hat S}}$, and therefore start your derivation with
$$[{\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}},{\bf{\hat C}}] = ({\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}}){\bf{\hat C}} - {\bf{\hat C}}({\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}}).$$
But from there, I'm not sure how you can safely proceed, if you're being rigorous with your dots and parens. For instance — and correct me if I'm wrong on this — but I don't think $({\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat C}}){\bf{\hat B}}$ is equal to ${\bf{\hat A}}({\bf{\hat C}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}})$, so your next step seems iffy.