New Reply

Commutators of vector operators

 
Share Thread
Jan19-12, 02:23 AM   #1
 

Commutators of vector operators


I've been trying to work out some expressions involving commutators of vector operators, and I am hoping some of y'all might know some identities that might make my job a little easier.

Specifically, what is [itex]\left[\mathbf{\hat A}\cdot\mathbf{\hat B}, \mathbf{\hat C}\right][/itex]? Are there any useful identities to express this in terms of simpler commutators?

Any help is appreciated.
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> New language discovery reveals linguistic insights
>> US official: Solar plane to help ground energy use (Update)
>> Four microphones, computer algorithm enough to produce 3-D model of simple, convex room
Jan22-12, 05:21 PM   #2
 
Are you sure you mean a "vector operator", typically we talk about matrix operators when discussing the commutator relationships (or group elements in a more general setting).
Vector operator: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_operator

However, your question is straightforward,
[S,T] = ST - TS (by definition)

Start with [AB,C] = ABC - CAB (+ ACB - ACB )
= ABC - ACB + ACB - CAB
= A(BC - CB) + (AC - CA)B
= A[B,C] + [A,C]B

Therefore we conclude [AB,C] = A[B,C] + [A,C]B
to be an identity.
Does that answer your question.... you could have looked anywhere on the internet to get this.... so I'm guessing this isn't what you want.
Jan22-12, 05:27 PM   #3
 
You can also construct an identity using the so called anti-commutator: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Anticommutator.html
You should probably do this for practice.
Jan22-12, 09:52 PM   #4
 

Commutators of vector operators


Thank you for the replyreplies.

Quote by brydustin View Post
[S,T] = ST - TS (by definition)

Start with [AB,C] = ABC - CAB (+ ACB - ACB )
= ABC - ACB + ACB - CAB
= A(BC - CB) + (AC - CA)B
= A[B,C] + [A,C]B

Therefore we conclude [AB,C] = A[B,C] + [A,C]B
It seems to me that you're being pretty cavalier about vector multiplication, what with the way you're just putting vectors in a row next to each other without any dots or parentheses. For instance, what do you mean when you write “ABC”, when A, B and C are vector operators?

I would think that you should define [itex][{\bf{\hat S}},{\bf{\hat T}}] = {\bf{\hat S}} \cdot {\bf{\hat T}} - {\bf{\hat T}} \cdot {\bf{\hat S}}[/itex], and therefore start your derivation with
[tex][{\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}},{\bf{\hat C}}] = ({\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}}){\bf{\hat C}} - {\bf{\hat C}}({\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}}).[/tex]
But from there, I'm not sure how you can safely proceed, if you're being rigorous with your dots and parens. For instance — and correct me if I'm wrong on this — but I don't think [itex]({\bf{\hat A}} \cdot {\bf{\hat C}}){\bf{\hat B}}[/itex] is equal to [itex]{\bf{\hat A}}({\bf{\hat C}} \cdot {\bf{\hat B}})[/itex], so your next step seems iffy.
Jan23-12, 04:32 AM   #5
 
Yeah, sorry I don't know. I thought you were intending for matrix operators. Good luck.
New Reply

Tags
commutator, dot product, identities, vectors

Similar discussions for: Commutators of vector operators
Thread Forum Replies
Operators and Commutators help Quantum Physics 3
Need a lot of help with vector fields/vector operators Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Quantum Mechanics, commutators and Hermitian Operators Advanced Physics Homework 11
commutators and translation operators General Physics 5
commutators and translation operators General Physics 5