Is global warming natural or manmade?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the origins of global warming, debating whether it is a natural phenomenon or primarily manmade. Key points include a 28% increase in CO2 levels over the past 50 years, highlighting the greenhouse gas's role in climate change. Participants emphasize the importance of reducing CO2 emissions, particularly from the cattle industry, which contributes significantly to methane production. The conversation also notes the overlooked impact of cement production on greenhouse gas emissions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of greenhouse gases and their effects on climate change
  • Knowledge of CO2 and methane emissions sources
  • Familiarity with the environmental impact of the cattle industry
  • Awareness of the role of cement production in global warming
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods to reduce methane emissions from cattle farming
  • Explore the environmental impact of cement production on climate change
  • Investigate renewable energy alternatives to reduce CO2 emissions
  • Study the effects of solar intensity cycles on global warming
USEFUL FOR

Environmental scientists, climate change activists, policymakers, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of global warming and its causes.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
im still on the fence, is global warming natural or manmade? i don't know
i have read that eruptions from mamalian rear ends has a lot to do with it
how could one stop that.
no crudidity intended.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by wolram
im still on the fence, is global warming natural or manmade?

It's unclear, but more and more scientists are believing it to be a real enough possibility to be concerned about. It's certainly a fact that CO2 levels have been on the rise lately (28% increase in the past 50 years) and that CO2 (among other things) is a greenhouse gas.

I say 'an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure'. Given the serious possibility and the serious problems it could cause, it's worth proceeding carefully before we get in too deep. If anything, the effort to cut back on CO2 generation will also have benefits such as reduction of other associated pollutants, more efficient fuel use, etc. More studies are needed, caution is warranted, but no need to run amok in the streets yet.

i have read that eruptions from mamalian rear ends has a lot to do with it
how could one stop that.

Eat less beef.
(i.e., stop the economic incentive for more cattle farming)
"Mammalian" is too broad...I think you're referring to methane generation from the digestive system of the massive bovine industry worldwide.
 
It is also possible that cycles in solar intensity could play a role.

Interestingly, one of the biggest offenders is the production of cement but I rarely hear mention of this.

Here is a related link:
http://globalchange.gov/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K