Stone dropping - yet another free fall acceleration problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves two stones: one dropped from a height of 43.9 meters and another thrown downwards 1 second later. The first stone takes 2.99 seconds to reach the water, while the second stone, thrown after a delay, has only 1.99 seconds to reach the water. The correct initial speed of the second stone is calculated to be 12.31 m/s, not 30.5535 m/s as initially thought. The confusion arose from miscalculating the time the second stone was in free fall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (g = 9.8 m/s²)
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations
  • Familiarity with concepts of free fall and time intervals in motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations in detail, focusing on free fall scenarios
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple objects in motion with different time intervals
  • Learn about the implications of initial velocity on the motion of falling objects
  • Explore graphical representations of motion to visualize time and distance relationships
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion under gravity.

missrikku
I'm sorry, I am just having difficulty with being sure of myself when it comes to these problems. This one states:

A stone is dropped into a river from a bridge 43.9m above the water. Another stone is thrown vertically down 1.00 s after the first is dropped. Both stones strike the water at the same time. What is the initial speed of the second stone?

Well, I did this:

Y-Yo = 43.9m
a = -9.8 m/s^2

Vo1 = 0 m/s because it was just dropped

Y-Yo = Vot + 0.5at^2
43.9 = 0 + 0.5(9.8)t^2 = 4.9t^2 --> t1 = 2.99s

Since they both reached the water at the same time, t1 = 2.99s = t2.
Since stone 2 is thrown 1.00 s after stone 1, I decided to do: 2.99 + 1.00 = 3.99s to use for t in Y-Yo = Vot + 0.5at^2 for stone 2

So I got:

43.99 = Vo(3.99) + 0.5(-9.8)(3.99)^2 --> Vo = 30.5535 m/s

For some reason, I believe my method to be wrong because doesn't the t in Y-Yo = Vot + 0.5at^2 mean the total time it took to reach the water? And since they both reached the water at the same time, how can the t I used the second time be 3.99s? If I used 2.99s for t to get the Vo for stone 2, wouldn't that give me a Vo of 0? I am just confused as how to incorporate that 1.00s time lag and such :(

Also, because I've had much difficulty with these problems, can anyone give me some tips to solving these problems? Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you are confused by the time the second rock leaves. What you put says that the first rock reaches the water and then one second later you throw the second rock. Instead the first rock gets dropped, and while it is in the air, the second rock is thrown.

Here is the detailed solution:

For the first rock the equation is:

y = y0 - v0*t -(1/2)*a*t^2

y = 0m
y0 = 43.9m
v0 = 0m/s
t= ?
a = g

0 = 43.9 - (1/2)*g*t^2

Therefore the time it takes to get to the bottom is:

t = 2.99s

If the second rock left 1 second after, but both hit the water at the same time, the second rock only has 1.99s to reach the water

Therefore the equation for the second rock is

y = y0 - v0*t -(1/2)*a*t^2

y = 0m
y0 = 43.9m
v0 = ?
t= 1.99s
a = g

0 = 43.9 - v0*(1.99) - (1/2)*g*(1.99)^2

you can now solve for v0 which is:

v0 = 12.31 m/s
 
Last edited:
Missrikku: Since DDuardo gave the full answer (very nicely), you might have missed seeing exactly where you made your mistake:

The first stone takes 2.99 seconds to hit the water. You throw the second stone 1 second after the first and it hits the water at the same time as the first. That means the second stone falls for one second LESS than the first, not more! The "t" for the second stone is 2.99-1= 1.99 seconds NOT 2.99+1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K