yxgao
- 122
- 0
Why does a uniformly charged sphere that oscillates between two radii at a certain frequency not radiate power?
Thanks
Thanks
The discussion revolves around the question of why a uniformly charged sphere that oscillates between two radii does not radiate power. Participants explore concepts related to electric fields, radiation, and the behavior of charged objects in motion.
The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest that the lack of radiation is due to the symmetry of the charge distribution, while others raise questions about the effects of oscillation frequency and the nature of the electric field. References to classical theories and online resources have been provided for further exploration.
There are mentions of theoretical constraints regarding the nature of the charged sphere and its ability to oscillate while maintaining a uniform charge distribution. The discussion also touches on the complexities introduced by varying frequencies and the conditions under which radiation occurs.
yxgao said:Does the radiation only depend on the electric field outside of the sphere? Where can I find the expression of the power radiated?
Why does it not depend on other variables, such as the frequency of oscillation, or the radius?
Thanks for any replies.
yxgao said:So it does not matter that the sphere is constantly changing frequency? I haven't studied this topic in detail before. Is there an online reference that gives an introduction and relevant equations?
Thanks!
If the charge redistributes itself constantly as the radius changes so that [itex]\sigma[/itex] is uniform over the sphere at all times at all radii, there is no time dependent electric field. The only way the charge could redistribute itself that quickly is if the sphere was made of metal.yxgao said:Why does a uniformly charged sphere that oscillates between two radii at a certain frequency not radiate power?
What if the sphere was moving at a speed v?