How Do Geckos Use Van der Waals Setae Adhesive to Climb Surfaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SkepticJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Van der waals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of how geckos utilize van der Waals setae adhesive to climb various surfaces. Participants explore the implications of this mechanism for both biological understanding and potential engineering applications, raising questions about the nature of adhesion, the functionality of gecko toes, and comparisons to other adhesion methods like suction cups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks about the meaning of "directional adhesive" and whether geckos can push up from their toes or must hang from them.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to understand how geckos can remain adhered to surfaces without gravity peeling them off.
  • Some participants suggest that the angle of the setae relative to the surface is crucial for adhesion, allowing geckos to grip and release effectively.
  • There is a discussion about the differences between van der Waals forces and suction cup mechanisms, with some noting that suction is less effective on certain surfaces.
  • A participant references a scientific paper discussing the geometry of setae and how it relates to adhesive force, emphasizing that surface chemistry may not be the primary factor.
  • Another participant describes the structure of setae, comparing them to human hair with split ends that increase surface area contact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanics of gecko adhesion, with some agreeing on the importance of setae structure and function, while others question the clarity of comparisons to suction cups. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of how geckos manage adhesion under different conditions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the microscopic appearance of setae is not clearly depicted in referenced materials, leading to further questions about their structure and function. There is also a mention of the need for more detailed understanding of the forces at play.

SkepticJ
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
I've been highly interested in the van der Waals setae adhesive since it was discovered how geckos can stick to walls about three years ago. I have a few questions about it though and I haven't found the answers.

What does "directional adhesive" mean?

Do geckos have to hang from their toes or can their toes also be below them and they push up from them?

Basically I want to find out how geckos and eventually machines will be able to hold themselves on walls, buildings, cliffs etc. Could they stand off the wall without the adhesive pealing off or will they have to keep their bodies close to the surface being climbed to keep gravity from peeling them off like a long shaft of tungsten duct taped to the wall? Or does this even happen? I've never had a long tungsten rod to test it out with.

Here's a link for the people not in the know to get up to speed.
Autumn Gecko Lab

Thank you in advance for the help.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Please someone help. :frown:
 
SkepticJ, I'm going to move this to Biology where you may get a better response.
 
enigma said:
SkepticJ, I'm going to move this to Biology where you may get a better response.

Thanks. If no one does post I might just have to e-mail them. I didn't want to waste http://polypedal.berkeley.edu/Profs_office/Full/Full_home or other people's time. They have important work to do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bumped because I still want to know.
 
I think all of your questions were answered in the website you linked to. The angle the setae are positioned relative to the surface determines if they'll stick or not, so the geckos can both get a good sticky "grip" on the surface, and then as they tip their foot forward, can again release themselves. Interesting site there. Now I know more than I ever wanted to about how bugs, amphibians and reptiles climb walls. :biggrin:
 
Moonbear said:
I think all of your questions were answered in the website you linked to. The angle the setae are positioned relative to the surface determines if they'll stick or not, so the geckos can both get a good sticky "grip" on the surface, and then as they tip their foot forward, can again release themselves. Interesting site there. Now I know more than I ever wanted to about how bugs, amphibians and reptiles climb walls. :biggrin:

You know you might be right. Thanks. Leave it to me to not think enough about what I read.
 
I'm still wondering why this got moved to biology though. Because it's about geckos I guess. I think we should have some fun and send it over to the physicists next since neither the chemists nor biologists have anything more to add. The engineers might find it pretty cool too. If we keep passing the thread around, someone might have more to add on it. :biggrin:

I admit I'm still trying to figure out how it's different from a suction cup style foot.
 
Moonbear said:
I'm still wondering why this got moved to biology though. Because it's about geckos I guess. I think we should have some fun and send it over to the physicists next since neither the chemists nor biologists have anything more to add. The engineers might find it pretty cool too. If we keep passing the thread around, someone might have more to add on it. :biggrin:

I admit I'm still trying to figure out how it's different from a suction cup style foot.


:biggrin: Why not?

The mechanism is completely different. van der Waals forces
Suction works(but very poorly, try sticking a suction cup onto sandstone or even dusty glass) by a partial vacuum trying to suck matter into it because as the saying goes "Nature abhors a vacuum."
 
  • #10
SkepticJ said:
:biggrin: Why not?

The mechanism is completely different. van der Waals forces
Suction works(but very poorly, try sticking a suction cup onto sandstone or even dusty glass) by a partial vacuum trying to suck matter into it because as the saying goes "Nature abhors a vacuum."

LOL! Yes, I caught they were saying they were using van der Waals forces, but as they describe the feet, they sounded more like a lot of little suction cups. I was more referring to the anatomy of the feet. I know, they showed pictures, but they weren't very clear when it got down to the microscopic appearance of the setae.
 
  • #11
Moonbear said:
they weren't very clear when it got down to the microscopic appearance of the setae.

From their 2002 PNAS paper vol 99 #19, p. 12252-6 :
If van der Waals adhesion determines setal force, then geometry and not
surface chemistry should dictate the design of setae. Let us
represent an individual seta as a stalk with a bundle of terminal
tips (spatulae). If we model spatulae as cylinders, each with a
hemispherical end of radius R adhering to a surface, then given
our empirical measurements of adhesive force, we can apply a
useful theory of adhesion (Johnson–Kendall–Roberts; refs. 4
and 23) to predict R for the spatulae.

Thus the ends of the setae split to multiple units (spatulae) that end in a half-spherical tip which they then calculate has a radius of 0.13-0.16 microns. I didn't include their calculation in the quote because many objects didn't convert well, but the article is freely viewable from the site linked in the original post. They did an elegant job of confirming van der Waals as the force involved and eliminating alternative mechanisms.
 
  • #12
A way think about setae is like a human hair to small to see with the unaided eye. And the hair has split ends which are too small to see with even optical microscopes. Some have even up to a thousand "split ends" per hair. The ends of the split ends have a paddle-like structure with gives good surface area contact. Hence the name spatulae, like the kitchen tool for mixing cake stuff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
19K
Replies
1
Views
2K