Finding Charge Conjugation Eigenvalues


by v0id19
Tags: charge conjugation, conservation, discrete symmetry
v0id19
v0id19 is offline
#1
Feb20-12, 10:04 PM
P: 49
I've just recently been introduced to charge conjugation while reading the introductory particle physics texts by Griffiths and Perkins, and neither one really seem to explain how you go about finding the values for C.

For example, if I wanted to find the value for the [itex]\rho^0[/itex] meson (which I believe should be -1), the only real example in Perkins simply says [itex]C_{\rho} = -1 [/itex] since [itex] \rho^0 \rightarrow e^+e^-[/itex], from which I assume that we (somehow) know that the [itex]e^+e^-[/itex] system has C=-1 and by charge conjugation conservation so does the [itex]\rho^0[/itex]. But how does actually go about figuring out the [itex]C_{e^+e^-}[/itex]?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
ofirg
ofirg is offline
#2
Feb21-12, 05:53 AM
P: 82
Both the [itex]\rho^{0}[/itex] and the [itex]e^{+}e^{-}[/itex] system are fermion-antifermion states. For these states, the eigenvalues of C depend on the spin and orbital angular momentum of the system. The reason is that the C operator transforms a particle to its antiparticle, but doesn't change the spin or momentum. Therefore, in order to return to the initial state one needs to exchange the momenta in the spatial wave function which gives a factor [itex](-1)^{L}[/itex] and the spin in the spin wave function which gives a factor [itex](-1)^{S+1}[/itex] (when adding two spin 1/2, s=0 antisymmetric, s=1 symmetric). in addition there is another (-1) factor due the exchange of two fermions. therefore, in total you get that C=[itex](-1)^{L+S}[/itex]. In the quark model [itex]\rho^{0}[/itex] is a quark anti-quark bound state with S=1 and L=0 (J=1), and therefore C=-1. Meaning that a [itex]e^{+}e^{-}[/itex] state that it would decay to must have an odd L+S.
v0id19
v0id19 is offline
#3
Feb21-12, 10:58 AM
P: 49
Ah I see, that makes sense. So charge conjugation in fermions is similar to parity then (when you say you need to exchange angular momentum/spin to return to the original state), or is this not a good way to think about it?

ofirg
ofirg is offline
#4
Feb21-12, 03:38 PM
P: 82

Finding Charge Conjugation Eigenvalues


They are both discrete symmetries, but they act differently.
In the case of parity, the spin doesn't change and the particle identity doesn't change, it is only the momentum which changes sign. In order to return to the initial state one has to change the momenta sign in the orbital wave function, which gives a factor [itex](-1)^{L}[/itex]. In addition, the intrinsic parities of a fermion and its antiparticle are of opposite sign, therefore the a fermion-antifermion pair has odd intrinsic parity. This give another factor (-1),
giving a value of P=[itex](-1)^{L+1}[/itex]. For example the pion, which has L=0, has P=-1 (pseudoscalar).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
What changes under charge conjugation High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 4
Charge Conjugation Operation High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 6
Change of energy under charge conjugation High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 15
help! About charge conjugation of Dirac spinor Quantum Physics 1
Charge Conjugation Invariance of the Vacuum Beyond the Standard Model 0