New Reply

why negative times negative is positive

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb24-12, 10:34 AM   #1
 

why negative times negative is positive


hey friend can anybody give answer?
why (-) * (-) = (+)
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Feb24-12, 11:09 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Its impossible to give an explanation that you would accept without knowing what kind of explanation you would accept!

For example, one can show that a(b+ c)= ab+ ac (the "distributive law"). In particular, if we take a=-x, b=y, c= -y, that says -x(y+ (-y))= -x(y)+ (-x)(-y). But y+(-y)= 0 and -x(0)= 0 so that tells us that -x(y)+ (-x)(-y)= 0. Adding x(y) to both sides, -x(-y)= x(y).

Is that acceptable?
Feb24-12, 11:16 AM   #3
dx
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Think of -a as a reflection of a through the origin. Reflecting twice gives you back a: -(-a) = a.
Feb25-12, 10:42 AM   #4
 

why negative times negative is positive


i was cleared after going through this.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/multiplying-negatives.html
Feb25-12, 11:09 AM   #5
 


nice link
Feb26-12, 04:51 AM   #6
 
I have a simple explanation if u confined to Integers only
first of u need to know why - * + = -
multiplication is seemed to be derived from addition. Like2*3=2+2+2. and 3+4=3+3+3+3..
So when u write (-3)*4= (-3)+ (-3)+ (-3)+ (-3)=- (-12)
hence it is proved that (-)* (+)= (-)

Now come to (-)* (-)= (+)
Let me say u want to solve the question something like this. (-1)/1. you must have done divisions in primary classes where you make make a pie ∏ shape. write denominator part inside and numerator part outside etc,..
when u do such ting with (-1)/1. then u have two choices for quotient 1 or (-1). If u put 1 then using quotient rule. 1*(-1)+0=1 . But it's wrong so -1 is only answer u can think of..

All this is poor explanation since real numbers and complex number are not taken.
Quote by Hallsoflvy
Its impossible to give an explanation that you would accept without knowing what kind of explanation you would accept!

For example, one can show that a(b+ c)= ab+ ac (the "distributive law"). In particular, if we take a=-x, b=y, c= -y, that says -x(y+ (-y))= -x(y)+ (-x)(-y). But y+(-y)= 0 and -x(0)= 0 so that tells us that -x(y)+ (-x)(-y)= 0. Adding x(y) to both sides, -x(-y)= x(y).

Is that acceptable?
these all are based on logics and data.2+(3+5)=2*8=2*3+2*5 after many tries it was found that is applicable everywhere so it's made as property of numbers.
similar about others...
Feb26-12, 09:02 AM   #7
 
There are several good explanations here:

http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.negxneg.html
Feb29-12, 12:12 AM   #8
 
mathforum is also not bad..
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: why negative times negative is positive
Thread Forum Replies
Is zero positive or negative ? General Math 112
Negative times negative General Math 9
neither positive nor negative ? General Math 85
Component vectors positive or negative and angles positive or negative Introductory Physics Homework 5
why a negative times a negative is positive General Math 0