How Does Donnie Darko Explore Time Travel and Fate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunfist
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exploration of time travel, fate, and alternate universes as depicted in the movie "Donnie Darko." Participants share their interpretations and personal connections to the film, while also addressing its scientific plausibility and narrative structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a personal affinity for the movie and its themes, noting how it resonates with their own experiences.
  • One participant suggests that the funnel imagery in the film represents a person's desires or paths, while another proposes that these funnels guide individuals along predetermined paths.
  • A participant critiques the film's handling of time travel, asserting that it was not intended to be a time travel movie and referencing the director's comments about the narrative being imagined by Donnie before his death.
  • Others counter this perspective by discussing the concept of the 'Tangent Universe' and the role of Donnie as the 'Living Receiver,' suggesting that a deeper understanding can be gained from supplementary materials like 'The Philosophy of Time Travel.'
  • There is a mention of other films that are perceived to handle time travel more coherently, such as "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure" and "Twelve Monkeys," contrasting them with "Donnie Darko."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the film's themes and interpretations. While some appreciate its artistic approach, others challenge its coherence in terms of time travel and narrative intent. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the film's meaning and implications.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the film's narrative and the director's intentions are based on interpretations that may not be universally accepted. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with supplementary materials related to the film.

Sunfist
Have any of you seen the movie "Donnie Darko"? What do you think about it. I know it doesn't handle time travel and the roll of fate and alternate universes in the most 100% scientific way possible, but I find it very interesting. In fact, it's become one of my favorite movies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i love that movie and i'd highly recommend it to anyone.

i do like the fact that no one postulated (within the movie) that the experiences were at all spiritual in nature; that term seems to be a cop out to scientists seeing concrete explanations. indeed, perhaps everything will have a concrete explanation one day. that would appeal to the mathematican in me.

i see some similarities between donnie and myself at times. if i could just find my own dr. carter as a physics teacher, i'd be happy. i am happy about never seeing anything like frank, though i have seen some things...

in some ways it reminds me of dr. nash and his breaks with reality as most people see it. apparently when nash went to einstein to revise relativity, einstein told nash to learn some more physics...

cheers,
phoenix
 
I know what you mean. After seeing that movie, as much as I'd like to not admit it, I start to relate it to my life sometimes. The Donnie/Frank dichotomy and stuff. Very good.
 
I saw that movie and I really liked it. I need to see it again to understand it better.
Can any of you explain in detail behind the funnel coming out of his stomach. I didn't understand how that would be possible.
 
i think the funnel indicated where one was desiring to go or in donnie's case, where he didn't know he wanted to go.
 
i think in donnie darko the funnels were indeed workers as mentioned in the movie and that they were assigned to every person to direct them on the correct paths but early in the time of man we became caught up in what is "real" and we lost sight due to our thoughts which goes with the theory that thoughts rule reality not reality itself.
 
Donnie Darko was not a bad movie,
but it was lousy from the perspective of time
travel, since it was not even supposed to
be a time travel movie.
The director of Donnie Darko in one of the
interviews said that everything that
happened in the movie was just imagined
by Donnie right before he died in his bed.

If you want truly coherent time travel
movie, cite "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure" (even though
it's silly), and "Twelve Monkeys".
Time Machine, Terminator, Donnie Darko, they just
dont work.

Whoever is trying to give more sense to
the Donnie Darko movie is trying to assert
something that was never there.
 
Actuallu ambient, the original Terminator film(not the last two) had a pretty good interpretation of time travel if it's possible: you can't change it, but reinforce it.
 
You are right chronus,
the Terminator's continuity was ruined by the sequels.

THe first Terminator movie had it perfectly right.
 
  • #10
Originally posted by ambient
The director of Donnie Darko in one of the
interviews said that everything that
happened in the movie was just imagined
by Donnie right before he died in his bed.


Is your source on that reliable?
Because that's not what actually happens at all.
If you want to understand, read 'The Philosophy of Time Travel'
It's not a real book, but it's on the DVD, and you can find copies of it on the 'Net, just run up a Google search for it...

Basically, everything that occurs in the movie takes place in the so-called 'Tangent Universe', and Donnie is the 'Living Reciever'.
But if you want that to make sense you'll have to read the book.

Well, toodles, people!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K