Rotational force compared to spring constant?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a mass suspended from a spring undergoing steady circular motion. The original poster seeks to derive an equation for the length of the spring in terms of its equilibrium length, the period of rotation, and the spring constant.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various equations relating the forces acting on the mass and the spring, questioning how to eliminate mass from the equations while still expressing the length of the spring in the required terms.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the role of gravity and the forces acting in the horizontal plane. Some participants have provided equations and suggestions for approaching the problem, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the setup of the problem, including whether the equilibrium length of the spring is affected by the mass and how to account for the geometry of the system. There is also mention of a link to an external resource for further clarification.

pirland
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Maybe I'm just losing it but I can't seem to find a way to reduce this equation to the terms it requires:

A weight is suspended on the end of spring that is stiff enough to have no perceptible sag or bend and a equilibrium length of b. If the system is undergoing steady circular motion in which one rotation takes time T, create an equation to calculate the length of the spring in terms of b,T, and k (spring constant).

I started out by making (M*4*pi^2*b)/T^2=k(L-b) where L is the current Length of the spring while under rotation and M is Mass.

If I solve for L I get L=(M*4*pi^2*b+b)/T^2*k, but am unable to get rid of the M for Mass. I suspect that it could be canceled out by the mass component of k, but then that would not leave a k in the equation.

Am I way off on this? Can it be expressed in only those three terms? Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Was there a picture accompanying this ?

What I picture is an initially vertical spring hanging from the ceiling, with the mass now executing horizontal circles.

In this case you have :

[tex]\frac{M \cdot 4 \pi^2 x^2}{xT^2} =kx \cdot \frac{\sqrt{b^2 + x^2} - b}{\sqrt{b^2 + x^2}}[/tex]

where x is the radius of the circle, so [itex]\sqrt{b^2 + x^2}[/itex] is the number you want.

Clearly, you've pictured this differently, so please throw in an explanation of the geometry.
 
Last edited:
pirland said:
Maybe I'm just losing it but I can't seem to find a way to reduce this equation to the terms it requires:

A weight is suspended on the end of spring that is stiff enough to have no perceptible sag or bend and a equilibrium length of b. If the system is undergoing steady circular motion in which one rotation takes time T, create an equation to calculate the length of the spring in terms of b,T, and k (spring constant).

I started out by making (M*4*pi^2*b)/T^2=k(L-b) where L is the current Length of the spring while under rotation and M is Mass.

If I solve for L I get L=(M*4*pi^2*b+b)/T^2*k, but am unable to get rid of the M for Mass. I suspect that it could be canceled out by the mass component of k, but then that would not leave a k in the equation.
This is a complicated problem. Is the equilibrium length b with or without the mass suspended from it? Assuming it is, just a few observations that may be of some help:

1. the vertical force is the vertical component of kx = mg where x is the extension of the spring. Length of spring, L = x+b
2. the horizontal force is the horizontal component of kx.
This provides the centripetal force:
[tex]F_c = m\omega ^2R = \frac{4\pi^2R}{T^2}[/tex]
where R = Lsinz where z is the angle from vertical.
3. the ratio of horizontal force to vertical force is the tangent of the angle z and is: [itex]tanz = \omega^2R/g[/itex]. This means [itex]cosz=g/\omega^2L[/itex]

Good luck.

AM
 
Clarification

Sorry I tried to quickly summerize the problem, but I guess i didn't make it very clear. Her is a link to the problem online.
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Newtonian/Newtonian_183.htm

Now unless I'm mistaked the wording seems to suggest that the relevant forces are all acting on the horizontal plane, with gravity being cancled out by the vertical stiffness of the spring. Is that how you guys read it?

With only foces in the horizontal plane it seems like it would be a simple matter to equate the spring force to the rotational force. But I wasn't able to get rid of Mass as a componant. Mabey I am making it to simple? should I be factoring other planes of force? again sorry for the confusion let me know you impressions of the problem or any glaring oversights I've made. Thanks.
 
Okay, this is not what I had pictured (nor do I suspect, had AM).

Yes, all you have to do is equate forces along the horizontal plane.

[tex]Mv^2/l = k (l-b) ~~[/tex]

Now use the fact that

[tex]T = \sqrt{M/k}= 2\pi l /v[/tex]

to substitute for M, v in terms of T, in the first equation.
 
Last edited:
pirland said:
Sorry I tried to quickly summerize the problem, but I guess i didn't make it very clear. Her is a link to the problem online.
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Newtonian/Newtonian_183.htm

Now unless I'm mistaked the wording seems to suggest that the relevant forces are all acting on the horizontal plane, with gravity being cancled out by the vertical stiffness of the spring. Is that how you guys read it?
Ok. This is a much simpler problem since gravity is not an issue. It may be simpler to work in angular velocity and then convert to the period using [itex]\omega = 2\pi/T[/itex]. You seem to have the centripetal acceleration as proportional to b. It is actually proportional to L. In other words, try starting with:

[tex]K(L-b) = M\omega^2L[/tex]

I do agree, however, that M has to be a factor in the expression for L.

AM
 
Once more into the breach

Ok so at least I know I was on the right track. Thanks both of you guys for responding so quickly after my 2nd post, yes your right L should be the radius, and good call Gokul43201 on the T=sqrt(M/k).
If I could trouble you for a little more of your time however, if I solve Gokul43201's equation for M and substitute it in my original equation it not only cancels out M, but T and k as well. This leaves me with something like: L=b/(4*pi^2-1).
This doesn't seem to fulfill the requirements the original problem was asking for especially when you look at part 2, where it asks you to analyze the problem for specific values of T. Any further thoughts on this problem? I'm having some trouble picturing what it is driving at in the second part much less defining it mathematically. Once again any tips or pointers would be appreciated.
 
pirland said:
This doesn't seem to fulfill the requirements the original problem was asking for especially when you look at part 2, where it asks you to analyze the problem for specific values of T. Any further thoughts on this problem? I'm having some trouble picturing what it is driving at in the second part much less defining it mathematically. Once again any tips or pointers would be appreciated.
The physical interpretation of this system is that it has a maximum period which Gokul correctly gave you. But that is derived from the equation of motion for the system, which is [tex]K(L-b) = m\omega^2L[/tex]. Work out the expression for L from this.

As

[tex]T \rightarrow 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}[/tex]

what happens to L?

AM
 
Last edited:
Thanks

Sorry to be so long responding, I got involved with something else. That finally makes sense, Thank you for all your patence.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K