Register to reply

Proving Bloch's Theorem

by naele
Tags: bloch, proving, theorem
Share this thread:
naele
#1
Feb26-12, 02:06 PM
P: 202
One of the more common ways of showing that a Hamiltonian with periodic potential commutes with the translation operator is to write the following (like Ashcroft and Mermin p. 133)

[tex]
T(R)H(r)\psi(r)=H(r+R)\psi(r+R)=H(r)T(R)\psi(r)
[/tex]

I suspect this might be a dumb question, but what allows us to write [itex]T(R)H(r)\psi(r)=H(r+R)\psi(r+R)[/itex], that is why is the translation operator acting on both the Hamiltonian and the wave, and not just on the Hamiltonian?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives
The first supercomputer simulations of 'spin?orbit' forces between neutrons and protons in an atomic nucleus
Magnets for fusion energy: A revolutionary manufacturing method developed
Colen
#2
May2-12, 03:14 AM
P: 2
I think its because the potential is periodic then the Hamiltonian is too: H(x)=H(x+a), you can then sub this in directly and the translation operator now just acts on psi
Hurkyl
#3
May2-12, 04:03 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,099
Quote Quote by naele View Post
I suspect this might be a dumb question, but what allows us to write [itex]T(R)H(r)\psi(r)=H(r+R)\psi(r+R)[/itex]
Because that is the definition of how the space translation operator acts on a ket.

It may help to write [itex]\theta(r) = H(r) \psi(r)[/itex]. [itex]\theta(r)[/itex] is a ket. What [itex]T(R) \theta(r)[/itex]....


It may help more to consider more traditional function notation for what I believe is being written:
[tex] (T(R) H \psi)(r) = (H \psi)(r + R).[/tex]


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Bloch theorem? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
Bloch's theorem for finite systems ? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 3
Bloch theorem Advanced Physics Homework 1
Counter example to the Bloch's theorem? Quantum Physics 11
Periodic potential: Bloch's theorem Quantum Physics 25