Satellite detection of fossil fuels?

In summary: Therefore, a satellite alone may not be sufficient to detect these deposits and additional methods may need to be employed. In summary, there are currently no known means to detect subterranean deposits of fossil fuels on Mars with an orbital satellite without relying on surface seepage, but there have been advancements in remote sensing technology that could potentially be used indirectly.
  • #1
HowardVAgnew
8
0
I've been searching for information on this, but it comes with a caveat -- I'm wondering if there is a known means by which deposits of petroleum, coal or other "fossil fuel" deposits could be detected remotely with an orbital satellite, but not rely on such fossil fuel material giving any visible indication on the surface, such that it could be used to, say, search for deposits like coal or oil on Mars by building and deploying such a satellite to orbit Mars as a means of searching for evidence of past life. With Mars' lack of plate tectonics, I imagine surface cracks enabling oil seeping onto the surface is less likely than on Earth and even even when such cracks do occur and oil seeps out, the planetwide dust storms would likely cover, obscure and bury such giveaways.

To repeat the essential question: do we have technology that can detect subterranean deposits of fossil fuels, such as petroleum, with remote technology that is not limited to looking for signs of surface seepage?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not really. The closest would be satellites such as GRACE and GOCE that are used to build gravity models. However, while gravity models are used in oil exploration, these satellite-only gravity models aren't of high enough resolution to detect oil deposits. Moreover, both the GRACE and GOCE projects depend on GPS. There is no Martian GPS.

There probably isn't oil or coal on Mars. Life on Mars (still an if) probably barely eked by and never went into overdrive like it did a few times in Earth's history. Our oil and coal were formed during a few key points in time when life on Earth was particularly prolific. The Carboniferous (note the name) climate was significantly warmer and had significantly higher levels of oxygen and CO2 than present.There was a planned joint European/NASA satellite to look for the sources of methane in Mars atmosphere, but Obama's Feb 13 budget proposal nixed that idea (and lots of others). The next few years are going to be very, very ugly for NASA.
 
  • #3


As far as I know, there is currently no technology that can detect subterranean deposits of fossil fuels from an orbital satellite without relying on surface seepage. However, there have been some advancements in remote sensing technology that could potentially be used to detect these deposits indirectly.

One method is called remote sensing of gravity and magnetic fields. This involves using satellites to map the gravity and magnetic fields of a planet, which can then be used to identify areas with potential hydrocarbon reserves. This method has been successfully used on Earth and has also been proposed for use on Mars.

Another potential method is using hyperspectral imaging, which can detect different types of minerals based on their unique spectral signatures. This has been used to identify hydrocarbon deposits on Earth and could potentially be adapted for use on Mars.

However, both of these methods would still require some level of surface seepage in order to accurately identify the presence of fossil fuels. Without any surface seepage, it would be difficult to differentiate between potential hydrocarbon deposits and other types of rocks or minerals.

In short, while there are some remote sensing technologies that could potentially be used to detect subterranean fossil fuel deposits, they would still rely on some level of surface seepage and may not be as effective on a planet like Mars with limited tectonic activity.
 

1. How does satellite technology detect fossil fuels?

Satellite technology uses various remote sensing techniques to detect fossil fuels. This includes thermal infrared imaging, which can detect heat signatures from underground reserves, and hyperspectral imaging, which can identify specific chemical signatures associated with fossil fuels.

2. Can satellite detection accurately locate and quantify fossil fuels?

Yes, satellite technology can accurately locate and quantify fossil fuels. However, the accuracy may vary depending on the type of remote sensing technique used and the resolution of the satellite imagery.

3. What are the limitations of using satellite detection for fossil fuels?

One limitation of using satellite detection for fossil fuels is the interference of clouds and other weather conditions, which can affect the accuracy of the data. Additionally, satellite imagery can only detect fossil fuels within a certain depth, so it may not be able to detect deeper reserves.

4. How is satellite technology being used for fossil fuel exploration?

Satellite technology is being used for fossil fuel exploration by providing a cost-effective and efficient way to survey large areas of land. It can also help identify potential drilling locations and monitor changes in reserves over time.

5. Is satellite detection of fossil fuels environmentally friendly?

Yes, satellite detection of fossil fuels is considered environmentally friendly compared to traditional methods such as ground surveys and drilling. It minimizes the impact on the environment and reduces the need for on-site exploration, which can disrupt natural habitats.

Similar threads

  • Earth Sciences
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
18
Views
7K
Back
Top