# Accuracy, Precision and Sensitivity for measurement instruments

by Acid92
Tags: accuracy, instruments, measurement, precision, sensitivity
 P: 41 My book defines accuracy as the closeness of a measurement to the real/actual value, precision as when a set of values are consistent with each other (i.e. close to each other) and sensitivity as the smallest possible reading of an instrument (i.e. to how many decimal places it can measure). Ive searched the web and Im finding these definitions too. However Ive read "precision" in the context of an instrument (rather than actual measurement values) being applied to what my book defines as sensitivity and have even heard accuracy too. Are these just non technical words used in the lay world or am I missing something here? Would it be,for example, incorrect to say my ruler is precise to the nearest mm or accurate to the nearest mm?
 Sci Advisor P: 5,776 As is, the ruler is precise. It is accurate to the extent that it agrees with some standard ruler.
 P: 31 This is what I was told in my maths lecture a few days ago: Imagine you have some darts and a dartboard. If majority(I don't know if I should say maximum in this context) of darts hit the center circle then your aims are accurate. If majority(or maximum) number of darts hit the same ring then your aim is precise. Did it help?
P: 41

## Accuracy, Precision and Sensitivity for measurement instruments

Ive been looking around and it seems that sensitivity is generally not used at all. The term "precision" is used for it as well so here it seems to have two seperate definitions, the precision of a set of measurement values is their relative closeness to each other but the precision of an instrument is how small of a unit it can measure to (e.g. to the nearest cm).
Mentor
P: 13,650
 Quote by shpongle This is what I was told in my maths lecture a few days ago: Imagine you have some darts and a dartboard. If majority(I don't know if I should say maximum in this context) of darts hit the center circle then your aims are accurate. If majority(or maximum) number of darts hit the same ring then your aim is precise. Did it help?
I disagree with both of those assessments. Suppose two throwers consistently misses the center, one always hits the outermost ring with the darts nicely distributed about this outer ring, and the other thrower has a very tight cluster of darts several inches from the center circle. The first thrower is accurate but is not precise. The second is precise but not accurate.

Accuracy is a statement about the mean, while precision looks at the variance.
P: 5,776
 Quote by D H I disagree with both of those assessments. Suppose two throwers consistently misses the center, one always hits the outermost ring with the darts nicely distributed about this outer ring, and the other thrower has a very tight cluster of darts several inches from the center circle. The first thrower is accurate but is not precise. The second is precise but not accurate. Accuracy is a statement about the mean, while precision looks at the variance.
If the object of the game is to hit the center, then consistently hitting the outer ring is not accurate.
Mentor
P: 13,650
 Quote by mathman If the object of the game is to hit the center, then consistently hitting the outer ring is not accurate.
In the lay meaning of the term "accurate", you're right. This thread is not about the lay meaning. In a lay sense, accuracy and precision are more or less synonyms.

When one is talking about scientific instruments, for example, accuracy and precision have very distinct meanings. With the technical meaning of "accurate", consistently hitting the outer ring is accurate if the mean is right on target. This kind of throwing is not very precise (technical meaning).

Two statisticians went duck hunting ...