Why Do Transformer Voltage-Current Graphs Disagree?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancies between the voltage-current graphs of a transformer and the predictions made using its equivalent circuit. The user, Chris, observes that the open-circuit graph yields a curve, while the equivalent circuit predicts a straight line intersecting the curve at two points, including the rated voltage. The conversation highlights the impact of core permeability changes as the transformer approaches saturation, suggesting that this non-linear behavior, influenced by hysteresis, contributes to the observed differences in the graphs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformer equivalent circuits
  • Knowledge of open circuit and short circuit tests
  • Familiarity with magnetic core permeability and saturation
  • Basic concepts of hysteresis in magnetic materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of magnetic core saturation on transformer performance
  • Study hysteresis losses in AC magnetic materials
  • Explore non-linear modeling of transformers in electrical engineering
  • Investigate the impact of core materials on transformer efficiency and distortion
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying transformer theory, and professionals involved in transformer design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

ChrisHarvey
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I have obtained the approximate equivalent circuit of a transformer at its rated supply voltage having carried out the open circuit and short circuit tests on it.

If I plot a graph of primary voltage against primary current for an open-circuited transformer I get a curve. If I use my equivalent circuit to give me predicted values for this, it gives me a straight line which intersects the curve at 2 places: one intersection is at the rated voltage.

Why is it that the 2 graphs do not agree?

I have thought about it and am wondering if it has anything to do with the fact that the relative permeability of the core changes as it reaches saturation. This would change my graphs in the 'right direction' but I have read nothing about this kind of thing in any textbook - but then I can't find this explained anywhere.

Is this idea correct, or is there some other reason for this?

Thank you very much to anyone who can give me any help,
it is much appreciated,
Chris
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Permeability of magnetic cores is not in general a constant and heads towards zero at saturation -- look up the topic of Hysteresis this deals with losses in cores in AC conditions . Since this is a non-linear effect it is often only represented as an equivalent resistance ( but recognizing this is an average value under the exciting conditions ) , in fact it would give rise to harmonics of a sine signal hence distortion in audio signals as well as pure losses. Some materials are far better than others hence their use in so called high'Q' coils or at RF. Try 'Wikipedia' for an explanation , search Yahoo.
Ray
 
Thankyou for your reply - I've found it really helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K