What is the Proof for Kinetic Energy in a Circular Magnetic Field?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between kinetic energy and the radius of curvature for a charged particle moving in a circular path within a magnetic field. The subject area includes concepts from electromagnetism and classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy and radius of curvature, questioning how to derive one from the other using relevant equations. They discuss the implications of substituting values and the significance of resulting identities.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into manipulating equations to express kinetic energy in terms of radius. There is an ongoing exploration of how to relate these quantities, with various interpretations being considered. A few participants express confusion about the steps involved, while others attempt to clarify the relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of deriving the relationship without losing track of variables and constants, particularly in the context of changing velocities. There is an acknowledgment of the foundational material being reviewed, suggesting a familiarity with the concepts involved.

joej
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
this should probably go in the HS section since it is review of some material covered there but... I'm guessing the same peole brose the two forums so I might as well post it here since it came up in college.

now the questions seems quite straight forward:

for a particle of mass m and charge q, moving in a circular path in a magnetic field B, show that its kinetic energe is proportional to the square of the radius of curvature of its path.

so we have:

r = (mv^2)/qvB
r = mv^2/F

F = ma
F = m((v^2)/r)

r = (mv^2)/(m((v^2)/r))

now... it all evens out and I'm stuck with nothing... could someon tell me where I'm going wrong with this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you get a result like 1 = 1 or r = r, it means you're substituting an equation into itself, which should naturally take you nowhere.

--J
 
1.Do you know the expression of KE in terms of velocity??

2.Can u compute/find a relation between the radius of trajectory and the velocity the particle has...?

Daniel.
 
KE = 1/2 mv^2

yeah I know that

still don't see how I can go from r = (mv^2)/F to r^2 = 1/2 mv^2
 
joej said:
KE = 1/2 mv^2

yeah I know that

still don't see how I can go from r = (mv^2)/F to r^2 = 1/2 mv^2

Can u prove that:
[tex]r_{traj.}=\frac{mv}{qB}[/tex]

Daniel.
 
joej said:
this should probably go in the HS section since it is review of some material covered there but... I'm guessing the same peole brose the two forums so I might as well post it here since it came up in college.

now the questions seems quite straight forward:

for a particle of mass m and charge q, moving in a circular path in a magnetic field B, show that its kinetic energe is proportional to the square of the radius of curvature of its path.

so we have:

r = (mv^2)/qvB

This is all you need. As well as KE=1/2 mv^2

Use the two equations you've got:
r=(mv^2)/qvB and
KE=1/2mv^2

to get a relationship between KE and r.
 
learningphysics said:
This is all you need. As well as KE=1/2 mv^2

Use the two equations you've got:
r=(mv^2)/qvB and
KE=1/2mv^2

to get a relationship between KE and r.

Forgive my thickness but I can't figure out how to go from those two to proving that (r^2) is proportional to (1/2 mv^2)


dextercioby said:
Can u prove that:
[tex]r_{traj.}=\frac{mv}{qB}[/tex]

Daniel.

well yeah that's just the v at the bottom is canceled out by v^2 and the square is thus also gone, but where do I go from there
 
If u can prove that,it means u can prove it is valid even when it's squared:
[tex]r_{traj.}^{2}=\frac{m^{2}v^{2}}{q^{2}B^{2}}=\frac{2m}{q^{2}B^{2}}\frac{mv^{2}}{2}=C\cdot (KE)[/tex]

Voilà.

Daniel.
 
joej said:
Forgive my thickness but I can't figure out how to go from those two to proving that (r^2) is proportional to (1/2 mv^2)

Taking your first equation
r=(mv^2)/qvB

if I solve for v I get
v=rqB/m

Then I plug it into the KE equation
KE=(1/2)mv^2

[tex]KE=\frac{1}{2}m(\frac{rqB}{m})^2[/tex]

[tex]KE=\frac{q^2B^2}{2m}r^2[/tex]

since [tex]\frac{q^2B^2}{2m}[/tex] is a constant, this proves KE is proportional to r^2.

You needed an expression for KE in terms of r, and constants (v is not a constant here as it changes with r), so you needed to get rid of that v... so solve for v in the first equation and plug it into the second... so all that is left is constants and r's.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
ah okay I finally get it thnx to both of you, great help, really appreciate it ;)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
890
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K