| New Reply |
Commutative finite ring and the Euler-Lagrange Theorem |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar26-12, 10:25 AM | #1 |
|
|
Commutative finite ring and the Euler-Lagrange Theorem
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
We are given the ring [itex]Z[/itex]/1026[itex]Z[/itex] with the ordinary addition and multiplication operations. We define G as the group of units of [itex]Z[/itex]/1026[itex]Z[/itex]. We are to show that g[itex]^{18}[/itex]=1. 2. Relevant equations The Euler-phi (totient) function, here denoted [itex]\varphi[/itex](n) 3. The attempt at a solution I have verified that G is indeed a group and concluded that G contains all elements of [itex]Z[/itex]/1026[itex]Z[/itex] coprime to 1026. I also know from the Euler-Lagrange theorem that since every g[itex]\in[/itex]G is coprime to 1026, g[itex]^{\varphi(1026)}[/itex]=1 (mod 1026). [itex]\varphi(1026)[/itex]=18*18*2=648 [itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] g[itex]^{18*18*2}[/itex]=1 (mod 1026) (g[itex]^{18}[/itex])[itex]^{18*2}[/itex]=1 (mod 1026) (g[itex]^{18}[/itex])[itex]^{18}[/itex])(g[itex]^{18}[/itex])[itex]^{18}[/itex])=1 (mod 1026) So the element (g[itex]^{18}[/itex])[itex]^{18}[/itex]) is necessarily the identity or of order 2. A simple check shows that there are no integers h[itex]\in[/itex]G between 2 and 1025 such that h=(g[itex]^{18}[/itex])[itex]^{18}[/itex])=[itex]\sqrt{1026n+1}[/itex], n some positive integer. Thus (g[itex]^{18}[/itex])[itex]^{18}[/itex])=1 (mod 1026). (Is the above reasoning correct?) And here begins my trouble. I wish somehow to show that the greatest order of any element in G is 18 and that any other orders are composed of prime factors of 18. I suppose that the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups is of limited use here, since there are som many possible combinations of prime factors. I figure that the totient function will be of some aid, but I can't find a reason as for why there can't for instance be any elements in G of order 12 or 27. What makes 18 (or 9,6,3,2,1) so special? Could someone please give me a tip? Thanks! |
| Mar28-12, 09:30 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
##\phi(1026)=18^2## and not ##18^2 \cdot 2##.
|
| Mar29-12, 09:54 AM | #3 |
|
|
Thank you morphism.
I did notice myself yesterday that phi(1026)=18^2. However, I could not deduce why there are no elements in G of order greater than 18. The homework is already due and I will have it corrected and commented soon. But if someone still feels like coming up with suggestions you are very welcome. I simply can't get why there are no elements for which g^18[itex]\neq[/itex]1. For instance, can't there be any elements of order 12 or 27? |
| Mar29-12, 06:58 PM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Commutative finite ring and the Euler-Lagrange Theorem
Probably the easiest way to approach this is to note that we have the ring isomorphism $$ \mathbb Z / 1026 \mathbb Z \cong \mathbb Z/2 \mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/ 3^3 \mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/19 \mathbb Z $$ (this comes from the chinese remainder theorem) and hence the isomorphisms
$$ (\mathbb Z / 1026 \mathbb Z)^\times \cong (\mathbb Z/2 \mathbb Z)^\times \times (\mathbb Z/ 3^3 \mathbb Z)^\times \times (\mathbb Z/19 \mathbb Z)^\times \cong \mathbb Z/ (3^3 - 3^2) \mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/(19-1) \mathbb Z \cong \mathbb Z/18 \mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/18 \mathbb Z $$ of the unit groups. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Commutative finite ring and the Euler-Lagrange Theorem
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Commutative Ring | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 21 | ||
| Commutative ring theorem | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| non commutative ring | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 2 | ||
| non-commutative ring | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||