Personal Handheld Computers 500 years from now.


by lakers20
Tags: computers, handheld, personal
lakers20
lakers20 is offline
#1
Apr11-12, 05:24 PM
P: 3
I'm working on a science fiction novel about a prosecutor in the future.
He's assigned to different planets and they have an office system and he
has a personal handheld device of some type.
I need some help describing what this would be like in the future.
I'm sure we're past Blackberries and Droids with some AI thrown in.
Thanks for assisting a scientifically challenged lawyer...
LA
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Microbes provide insights into evolution of human language
Pengwuino
Pengwuino is offline
#2
Apr11-12, 05:33 PM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,125
Considering I don't think many people saw things like the iPad or current generation smartphones ever happening even 10 years ago, it would be silly to try to say what things will look like 500 years from now with any certainty.

One thing I would say is that as time goes on, it's not going to be about what a computer will look like in 500 years that will be interesting, but where computers will be in 500 years. Maybe your roof will be computerized or there will be computers built into your bicycle. Maybe sheets of paper will be computerized somehow (think e-inks). Now-a-days, hobbyists can control some of the most ridiculous things using computers that you'd never expect.
Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt is offline
#3
Apr11-12, 05:40 PM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 8,542
I agree 500 years is a long time to guess. I bet even the Star Trek Tricorder capabilities will seem silly by then.

Hobin
Hobin is offline
#4
Apr11-12, 05:56 PM
P: 194

Personal Handheld Computers 500 years from now.


Handhelds? If we still need to use our hands to access most of our devices in 2512, I'll be very surprised (though probably already dead).
Mech_Engineer
Mech_Engineer is offline
#5
Apr11-12, 06:04 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Mech_Engineer's Avatar
P: 2,234
My guess is there won't be anything hend-held in 500 years, it will be implants which link to your brain diretly.
lakers20
lakers20 is offline
#6
Apr12-12, 08:29 PM
P: 3
Thank you to everyone for giving me some ideas. It's much appreciated!
NeoDevin
NeoDevin is offline
#7
Apr13-12, 01:50 PM
P: 685
We're likely to see the introduction of wearable computing by the end of this year or early next year:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_glass
https://plus.google.com/111626127367496192147/posts
NeoDevin
NeoDevin is offline
#8
Apr13-12, 01:52 PM
P: 685
And then there's the MS version:
256bits
256bits is offline
#9
Apr13-12, 06:24 PM
P: 1,271
Quote Quote by NeoDevin View Post
We're likely to see the introduction of wearable computing by the end of this year or early next year:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_glass
https://plus.google.com/111626127367496192147/posts
That is just frigin annoying.
Borek
Borek is offline
#10
Apr14-12, 02:22 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,708
Quote Quote by NeoDevin View Post
And then there's the MS version:
ROFL, that was the first thing I saw when I started to browse PF which is a part of my morning routine. It already made my day.
Hobin
Hobin is offline
#11
Apr14-12, 03:24 AM
P: 194
Quote Quote by NeoDevin View Post
And then there's the MS version:
Ryan_m_b
Ryan_m_b is offline
#12
Apr16-12, 10:34 AM
Mentor
Ryan_m_b's Avatar
P: 5,350
As others have pointed out 500 years is far to long to have any meaningful speculation (after all imagine trying to predict current computer use 50 years ago). But here's a few ideas that might be helpful to you:
Cloud computing - do people need to carry around a computer or can they just use any interface to access data and outsource computation to computers elsewhere? IIRC bandwidth over air could be pushed up to as high as 1-2TBps, with that there should be pretty much no latency no matter what you are doing.

Natural language user interface - rather than awkward keyboards and commands why not simply talk to computers as we do people and have them understand and respond.

Intelligent personal assistant - imagine Siri 2.0+++. Not necessarily an artificial conscious being but software sophisticated enough to respond intelligently to instructions and innovate to carry out tasks. E.g. "Bring me up a list of murders in the last 100 years that have involved the same method and see if any of the evidence from those cases matches with this one.

Augmented reality - as google show above. Instead of boxy computers some glasses/contact lenses that take command via eye motion, voice and gesture could be used.

Internet of things - imagine if computers and interfaces were placed into every everyday object. Instead of carrying and using a phone/laptop you could talk to the nearest table and get it to display your emails or enquire directions from the pavement or order take away from wall paper or...

Brain computer interface - more speculative than the others but conceivably your characters could have chips interfaced with their brains that allow them to control them by thought. This has a long history of use in SF that is very varied.

That's all for now
Hobin
Hobin is offline
#13
Apr16-12, 02:04 PM
P: 194
Quote Quote by Ryan_m_b View Post
IIRC bandwidth over air could be pushed up to as high as 1-2TBps, with that there should be pretty much no latency no matter what you are doing.
That sounds like quite a bit (no pun intended). Not saying I don't believe you, but can you cite any sources that support this view?
Ryan_m_b
Ryan_m_b is offline
#14
Apr16-12, 02:21 PM
Mentor
Ryan_m_b's Avatar
P: 5,350
Quote Quote by Hobin View Post
That sounds like quite a bit (no pun intended). Not saying I don't believe you, but can you cite any sources that support this view?
Not really, I was told it by a friend who works for BT as an engineer. I should have written AFAIK rather than IIRC as it would have made more sense I suppose in that context. Hopefully someone who knows about the subject could comment as I'm be interested in it also

To the OP one last bit of advice would be that whatever you choose to write good SF you should make sure that your plot devices are explored in how they affect society i.e. their use is logical and consistent. For example if you write into the setting that people wore augmented reality devices that stored their data remotely you should probably consider the implications of widespread lifelogging (I use this as an example because SF author Charles Stross has addressed this in an excellent essay regarding how society is influenced by technology). Good science fiction IMO should make the plot fit the technology (i.e. "what would a world look like with technology X?") rather than the technology fit the plot (i.e. "my character's mode of transport needs to reflect the future hence it will be X").
Topher925
Topher925 is offline
#15
Apr16-12, 08:26 PM
Topher925's Avatar
P: 1,672
I don't think there will be any handheld computers 500 years from now as mankind, at least the modern civilization that we have now, will not exist. People won't even be able to find the rare earth metals required to make such devices except for in land fills.
luitzen
luitzen is offline
#16
Apr16-12, 09:04 PM
P: 50
I think 10-20 years from now, most homes won't even have a PC anymore and laptops will certainly be outdated. If you have a high tech gaming console and tablet computer, then why would you need a laptop or PC?

10 years ago there were no smartphones, now Google is announcing augmented reality glasses.

A while ago I wrote an article on transhumanism and consciousness to make the case that consciousness is not something intrinsically human or biological. Thinking about it has been a lot of fun, you could check it out.

And if I have to be completely fair I really doubt whether humanity is still around in 50 or 100 years. Is that a bad thing? I don't know, but it's not as we are gone extinct. Nobody is worried about being dead in a century when he sees his own kids growing up, so maybe we could view our successors as our 'spiritual' children. I think the future is completely unpredictable 50 years from now, even more than it was 50 years ago.

If you assume the world to be static, then you make an awful mistake, but when you assume the world to be completely dynamic, then there's nothing you can motivate. That's why you have to assume a semi-static world and live in the now.

The fancy tech SciFi movies and novels are all fun, but the stories which leave a lasting impression are those which focus less on the high tech stuff and more one the implications of how our socio-technological landscape is changing and how far prepared we are to carry those changes. A good example of such a story is the movie Gattaca.
Hobin
Hobin is offline
#17
Apr17-12, 02:33 AM
P: 194
Quote Quote by luitzen View Post
I think 10-20 years from now, most homes won't even have a PC anymore and laptops will certainly be outdated.
Ok, how much are you willing to bet on that?
luitzen
luitzen is offline
#18
Apr17-12, 03:16 AM
P: 50
Maybe it'll take a little longer, so I'm not willing to bet on that.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
If a day equaled 1000 years. How many years is half an hour? General Math 8
Your photonic rocket reaches planet A, 10 light-years away in 10 years. Special & General Relativity 14
Quantum computers in the next 50 years? Quantum Physics 21
Handheld or PDA using linux Computing & Technology 3
The original handheld (digital) calculator. Calculators 18