The Equivalence of Space and Time: A Hypothesis Supported by Evidence

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the hypothesis of the equivalence of space and time, exploring its theoretical implications and supporting evidence. Participants engage with concepts related to the nature of time, its relationship with space, and the mathematical frameworks that describe these ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that time is a dimension of space and suggests that the equivalence of space and time can be supported by various properties and hypotheses.
  • Another participant references historical figures, questioning whether the current discussion aligns with ideas proposed by Einstein and Minkowski.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that time is perceived as a change at different scales of observation, suggesting a qualitative equivalence between time and space based on interactions.
  • One participant introduces the Lorentz invariant equation, indicating a mathematical relationship that supports the discussion of space-time equivalence.
  • Another participant claims to have reached a mathematical conclusion linking mass-energy relations to the idea that time encompasses space and energy, proposing that they are manifestations of time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the relationship between space and time, with some referencing established theories while others present new hypotheses. There is no consensus on the validity of the claims made, and multiple competing views remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific definitions of time and space, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the nature of these dimensions.

Einstiensqd
NOTE: I really feel incredibly stupid about what I posted in the Mathmatics forum, I sincerely apologise to any real physiscists I insulted by trying to impress people by making up a formula and calling it possible. Please no criticism about that thread, but however, there seems to be a lot of evidence in my mind pointing to the equivelence of space and time.

What is time? Time is considered to be a dimension of space. I had a thought about time, and its reality, functions, and properties. I came to a conclusion of the equivelence of space and time. I also have evidence to make this hypothesis a theory.
I considered the properties of time, and of space. The only property of time is space, which has the properties of length, width, and hieght. Also, I considered perfect space. I found that perfect, undisturbed space-time did not include space or time. Time is a distortion of space caused by the presence(or mere existence)of space. Also, time cannot exist seperatley from space, and vice-versa. So, time and space can only exist as one. Time exists as matter exists, so hypotheticaly, that assists the steady state theory. Also, the flow of time is a source of energy, without it, no other energy can exist. So, as mass is equivalent to energy, time is equivalent to space.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Isn't that what a man called Einstein (actually it was Minkowski) proposed about 70 years ago. Or do you mean something else?
 
He did?
 
You've got it right!

Time is a change seen at the scales of observation. It is the scale of the interaction that creates what we see as time, space and everything else. So time and space are qualitatively equivalent because they are produced from multiscale similar all-building interactions (more information from the free downloads at http://www.eugenesavov.com)
 
Ah, yes...the Lorentz invariant:

s = c²t² - x² - y² - z²

s is always the same for every inertial frame.
 
In PF2.0 I have done such conclusion MATHEMATICALLY from mass - energy relation E=mc^2. Time contains in itself Space and Energy. In other words, Space and Energy present itself nothing other as Time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
28K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K