Register to reply

Why does velocity not vary with distance within 10 Mpc?

by em370
Tags: distance, vary, velocity
Share this thread:
em370
#1
Apr17-12, 09:16 AM
P: 22
For a science project I used Harvard's zcat data to construct a graph in excel of the velocity and distance of distant objects. I expected velocity to increase with distance due to the expansion of space but it seemed to only begin once the object was 10 Mpc from Earth. I included the graph but it is very small due to file size restrictions.
Attached Images
File Type: bmp Velocity graph.bmp (294.7 KB, 16 views)
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
Image: Chandra's view of the Tycho Supernova remnant
Bright like a diamond: lasers and compressed carbon recreate Jupiter's core
New mass map of a distant galaxy cluster is the most precise yet
Steely Dan
#2
Apr17-12, 09:51 AM
P: 317
Well, all galaxies have a relative motion through space relative to the Milky Way. In the field this is called a peculiar velocity. In particular, it's meant to be distinguished from the speed inferred from cosmological expansion. For objects close to home, the peculiar velocity may be similar in magnitude to the speed inferred from Hubble's law. Only once we get to cosmological distance scales does this stop being true (since most galaxies move at most at speeds of several hundred km/s in clusters).
mfb
#3
Apr17-12, 12:18 PM
Mentor
P: 11,589
While the response from Steely Dan is true, the actual data looks really weird.
- at the linear part, velocity is not proportional to distance
- in our universe there is nothing magic at 10 Mpc, the region at 11Mpc is similar to the region at 9Mpc. However, the graph shows two regions which are completely different.
- compared to the small deviations of most of the data points, there are a few points which are really off, up to 3-4% c (as deviation to the line).

zhermes
#4
Apr17-12, 02:44 PM
P: 1,261
Why does velocity not vary with distance within 10 Mpc?

Both responses are good ones above. Just wanted to add that there seems to be lots wrong with your plot---the velocities are also way too large. Remember Hubble's law:
[tex] v \approx H_0 d \approx 70 \textrm{ km/s} \left( \frac{d}{1 \textrm{ Mpc} } \right)[/tex]
em370
#5
Apr17-12, 05:11 PM
P: 22
I took all of the data from this website https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~dfabricant/huchra/zcat/ so I can't vouch for how the testing was done but harvard is a reputable university. I did notice that the line was shifted upwards quite a bit but I thought whatever may be forcing objects within 10 Mpc to not vary with distance may also be responsible for that. Also, the section of data outside 10 Mpc gives hubbles constant as about 72 km/s per Mpc which is fairly accurate along with a high initial velocity at 0 Mpc, which according to posters is not accurate. The velocity measurements are recorded as observed at Earth based on redshift. I feel like I must be missing something because the data come straight from the zcat and I doubt a distinguished college would publish something if the velocity data was off by a large amount.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is mass vary with velocity? Special & General Relativity 2
Does gravity vary with velocity? Special & General Relativity 4
Does the sum of the mass of two bodies vary with the distance between them ? Special & General Relativity 2
Velocity vs distance Special & General Relativity 31
Velocity and Distance Introductory Physics Homework 5