New Reply

Photo-electric effect, Compton Scattering

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr28-12, 03:34 PM   #1
 

Photo-electric effect, Compton Scattering


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
What is the maximum kinetic energy of electrons knocked out of a thin copper foil by Compston scattering of an incident beam of 17.5 KeV rays? Assume the work function is negligible.


2. Relevant equations
Δλ = h/mc (1-cosθ)


3. The attempt at a solution

I reasoned that the greatest energy transfer to an electron will occur when the x-ray rebounds at 180 degrees, in which case the change in wavelength is 4.85 x 10^-12 m.

I figured that the wavelength of the x-rays increases by this amount, thereby decreasing in energy. I thought I could therefore take this change in wavelength and calculate the energy associated with it using E = hc/Δλ, and I got E = 256 KeV.

However, the answer key requires that you calculate the wavelength of the original x-ray, add Δλ, then calculate the energy and deduct the original energy. It yields a different answer, 1.1 KeV.

I don't understand why you can't say that the energy loss associated with the increase in the wavelength of the x-ray is completely transferred to the electron and then be done with it. What am I missing? Thanks!!!!
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Front-row seats to climate change
>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays
>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug
Apr29-12, 07:51 PM   #2
 
Does anybody have any insight into what I'm doing wrong here? I'd appreciate any and all help :).
 
Apr29-12, 08:09 PM   #3
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 10
Quote by mm2424 View Post
3. The attempt at a solution

I reasoned that the greatest energy transfer to an electron will occur when the x-ray rebounds at 180 degrees, in which case the change in wavelength is 4.85 x 10^-12 m.

I figured that the wavelength of the x-rays increases by this amount, thereby decreasing in energy.
So far, so good.
I thought I could therefore take this change in wavelength and calculate the energy associated with it using E = hc/Δλ, and I got E = 256 KeV.
Not quite. First, note that it's impossible for a 17.5 keV photon to lose 256 keV of energy.

You have two energies, E1 = hc/λ1 and E2 = hc/λ2.

The energy difference E1-E2 is the difference between the hc/λ terms, not hc/Δλ. What you did is equivalent to saying
(1/5) - (1/3) = 1/(5-3) = 1/2,
which is not true.

Can you take it from here?

However, the answer key requires that you calculate the wavelength of the original x-ray, add Δλ, then calculate the energy and deduct the original energy. It yields a different answer, 1.1 KeV.
Yes, that is the basic idea.
 
Apr29-12, 08:19 PM   #4
 

Photo-electric effect, Compton Scattering


Thanks, that makes sense!
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Photo-electric effect, Compton Scattering
Thread Forum Replies
Question about Photoelectric Effect versus Compton Scattering. General Physics 4
Compton Scattering Effect: Max Kinetic Energy Introductory Physics Homework 17
Photo-electric Effect Introductory Physics Homework 1
Compton effect with no scattering angle Advanced Physics Homework 4
Particle Nature of Light versus Compton Scattering Effect Quantum Physics 3