Difference between Classical Momentum and Relativistic Momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between classical momentum and relativistic momentum, emphasizing that in relativistic physics, momentum is defined as p=mv, where 'm' represents relativistic mass rather than rest mass. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding Lorentz Transformations in relation to momentum calculations. Participants express concerns about the complexities of relativity, particularly in educational settings where language barriers exist.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and the equation p=mv
  • Familiarity with the concept of relativistic mass
  • Knowledge of Lorentz Transformations in special relativity
  • Basic physics education, preferably at the college level
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of relativistic mass on momentum calculations
  • Learn about Lorentz Transformations and their applications in physics
  • Explore the differences between classical and relativistic physics in detail
  • Review educational resources for overcoming language barriers in complex subjects
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, educators addressing language barriers in science, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of momentum in both classical and relativistic contexts.

DaVinci
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Classical Physics states that:

p=mv

So, for special relativity, would momentum be defined in the same manner except m is now equal to the relativistic mass instead of the standard 'rest mass' as used in the classical equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exactly,that's how momentum is defined for relatvistic systems...

What level of eduation do u have??

Daniel.
 
I am a junior in college. I just switched to a new university and my physics 3 professor is Russian and speaks 5% english... so I am feeling very uneasy about what we have learned so far. The Lorentz Transformations have thrown me through a loop. But as I find that more and more of my answers are correct that my confidence in this material is growing.

My main reason for asking this question was to ensure there wasnt any of the Transformations that had to apply to the velocity or anything of that nature. I was pretty sure it was just the mass change... but as I said... very iffy on the whole relativity thing at the moment. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K