What Is the Equation of Motion for a Pivoted Rod on an Accelerating Car?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a uniform thin rod pivoted at one end, attached to the top of an accelerating car. Participants are exploring the equilibrium angle of the rod and the equation of motion when the rod is displaced from this equilibrium position.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using Newton's second law for non-inertial frames to find the equilibrium angle and consider the Lagrangian method for deriving the equation of motion. There are questions about the complexity of the Lagrangian approach and whether simpler methods exist.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress on part (a) of the problem and are now focused on part (b). There is a recognition of the need to calculate torque and relate it to angular acceleration. While some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between angular displacement and acceleration, there is no consensus on the final solution or the stability of the equilibrium angle.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that air resistance can be ignored, and they are considering the implications of small angle approximations for the sine and cosine functions in their calculations.

matpo39
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
a uniform thin rod of length L and mass m is pivoted at one end the point is attached to the top of a car accelerating at a rate A.

a) what is the equilibrium angle between the rod and the top of the car?
b) suppose that the rod is displaced a small angle phi from the equilibrium derive the equation of motion for phi. Is the equilibrium angle stable or unstable?

I was able to get part a which using Newtons 2nd law for non inertial frames is
tan(equilibrium angle) = g/A.

but i am stuck on part b. I could use the lagrangian method to get phi(double dot) but that would be really messy, and was wondering if there would be a better way of getting it. oh and also he gave the hint to ignore air resistance and that torque= I*alpha.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matpo39 said:
a uniform thin rod of length L and mass m is pivoted at one end the point is attached to the top of a car accelerating at a rate A.

a) what is the equilibrium angle between the rod and the top of the car?
b) suppose that the rod is displaced a small angle phi from the equilibrium derive the equation of motion for phi. Is the equilibrium angle stable or unstable?

I was able to get part a which using Newtons 2nd law for non inertial frames is
tan(equilibrium angle) = g/A.

but i am stuck on part b. I could use the lagrangian method to get phi(double dot) but that would be really messy, and was wondering if there would be a better way of getting it. oh and also he gave the hint to ignore air resistance and that torque= I*alpha.

thanks

Getting the equation isn't hard but solving it might be...

I'm going to take theta to be the total angle from the horizontal, and phi as the angle from the equilibrium point.

Calculate the torque acting on the rod... this is in terms of theta. Then write down I * alpha = torque.

Plug in the value of I in terms of m and L. Plug in [tex]\alpha=\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}[/tex]

Then finally replace [tex]\theta[/tex] with [tex]\phi + tan^{-1}(g/A)[/tex]

That seems to give you the equation you need. It's a second order diff. equation... I'm not sure of the solution right now. But do you need the solution?
 
thanks for the help, it seems i forgot that alpha= phi(double dot), as soon i understood that the rest of the problem wasnt too hard.
 
The differential equation may be simplified for small [tex]\phi[/tex], since

[tex]\sin\phi = \phi[/tex] and

[tex]\cos\phi = 1[/tex] (approximately).

I don't know how to write ~ in latex.
 
matpo39 said:
thanks for the help, it seems i forgot that alpha= phi(double dot), as soon i understood that the rest of the problem wasnt too hard.

I'm curious about the final solution to this problem... Did you have to solve the diff. eq? If you did, can you post it?

It seems stable to me because the second derivative of phi, is zero at the equilibrium point... but I'm not sure if this is the correct reasoning.
 
This what you're looking for?

[tex]\approx[/tex]
 
Thank you Hurkyl, that's what I was looking for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K