Row reduced matrix has coefficents

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 3.14159265358979
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Row
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the solutions of the equation Ax = 0, where A is a row equivalent matrix. It concludes that there are no solutions due to contradictions in the row-reduced form, specifically from rows three and four. Additionally, it addresses the conditions under which the equation Ax = y has no solution and clarifies that if A is singular, then Ax = z cannot have a unique solution. The concept of the "Fredholm Alternative" is also highlighted, emphasizing the relationship between the singularity of matrix A and the existence of solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of row-reduced echelon form in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with the concept of singular and non-singular matrices
  • Knowledge of the Fredholm Alternative in linear equations
  • Basic vector space theory, particularly in R³
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of row-reduced echelon forms in linear algebra
  • Learn about singular and non-singular matrices in depth
  • Explore the Fredholm Alternative and its implications in linear systems
  • Investigate the kernel and image of linear transformations in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in solving systems of linear equations and understanding matrix theory.

3.14159265358979
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I just want to confirm these two questions. Thanks in advance.

(1) Describe all solutions of Ax = 0 in parametric vector form, where A is row equivalent to the given matrix.

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{uvwxyz}1 & 5 & 2 & -6 & 9 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 1 & -7 & 4 & -8\\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\end{array}\right)[/tex]

There are no solutions because row 3 and 4 contradict each other. Row 3 implies no solution.


(2) Suppose A is a 3x3 matrix and y is a vector in R^{3} such that the equation Ax = y does not have a solution. Does there exist a vector z in R^{3} such that the equation Ax = z has a unique solution?

I said no because if the vector y does not have a solution in R^{3}, then this implies the last row of the row reduced matrix has coefficents that are all zero. Therefore, it either has no solution or an infinite number of solutions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rows three and four do not contradict themselves. All it says is that, with the obvious notation x_6=0 from row 3, and, from row 4, that 0=0. Row 4 contradicts nothing. Besides which, x=0 is always a solution, or otherwise you are saying that the kernel is empty, and since it is a nonempty subspace...
 
Problem 2 is related to the "Fredholm Alternative". The equation Ax= b has a unique solution if A is "non-singular". If A is singular then Ax= b has either no solution or an infinite number of solutions depending on b. In this case, since Ax= y has no solution, it might be (and in fact must be) the case that there exist z such that Ax= z has an infinite number of solutions but there cannot exist z such that Ax= z has a unique solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K