New Reply

Simple Lie algebra question

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun26-12, 04:27 AM   #1
 

Simple Lie algebra question


I am currently trying to up my understanding of Lie algebras as the brief introductions I have had from various QFT textbooks feels insufficient, but have been stuck on one small point for a couple days now. I am reading through the lecture notes / book by Robert Cahn found here: http://theory.uchicago.edu/~sethi/Te...011/texall.pdf. On page 97, I am having trouble understanding how equation XI.31 comes about. I think I get how [itex]Tr C = N_\Lambda \langle \Lambda, \Lambda + 2 \delta \rangle_2 [/itex] comes about, but don't see how I can use the statement regarding (( , )) yielding [itex]l_\phi ( , )_2[/itex] and how that directly leads to XI.31.

A bit of guidance here would be very much appreciated. Thanks.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Jul14-12, 12:46 AM   #2
 
I am very sorry for bumping my own thread with a double post. If it turns out that I cannot get a response here, could someone perhaps recommend a more appropriate subforum for me to post in? Would "general math" be more promising? Thanks.
Jul14-12, 01:56 AM   #3
 
Hey vega12 and welcome to the forums.

With the normalization procedure, what is the definition of something with unit length in the context of the operator you are working with (the matrix)?
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Simple Lie algebra question
Thread Forum Replies
Simple Algebra Question... Introductory Physics Homework 4
simple algebra question General Math 2
Simple Algebra Question Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 3
simple algebra question Introductory Physics Homework 8
Simple algebra question General Math 6