| New Reply |
why we multiply in ψ* |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jun28-12, 07:45 AM | #1 |
|
Blog Entries: 2
|
why we multiply in ψ*
why in the quantum mechanics we must multiply ψ by ψ*
why we must multiply in the conjugate to find the probability density ? |
| Jun28-12, 07:59 AM | #2 |
|
|
using anything else will leave you with a complex result. Using the psi* gets you a real number.
|
| Jun28-12, 11:35 AM | #4 |
|
Blog Entries: 2
|
why we multiply in ψ*
and why is the probability density equal to multiply OF epsi it self
|
| Jun28-12, 01:19 PM | #5 |
|
|
perhaps this wikipedia article can explain it better:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation Part way down in the historical background section, the article mentions that Max Born interpreted the psi function as a probability amplitude which led to interpreting the psi*psi as the probability density something that physicists could measure in a system. |
| Jun28-12, 01:47 PM | #6 |
|
|
Multiplying by the complex conjugate gives you the norm squared. If you represent a complex number by the amplitude and phase, then multiplying by the complex conjugate is basically throwing away the phase information. We can't really measure the phase, only differences in phase. The phase is sort of a bookkeeping mechanism for keeping track of quantum interference.
|
| Jun29-12, 12:36 AM | #8 |
|
|
That isn't a quantum mechanics thing, it's a complex numbers thing. The magnitude of a complex number is given by [tex]z^* z[/tex] not [tex]z^2[/tex]. Think about it, if instead of a complex number I thought of z as a 2-dimensional vector, an x and y coordinate (the y is the complex part). Then the, euclidian, distance from the origin would be [tex]x^2+y^2[/tex]. So for a complex number [tex] a+bi[/tex] you might think the "distance" from the origin to the point in the complex plane is simply [tex](a)^2+(bi)^2[/tex] but that's really [tex]a^2-b^2[/tex]. In order to get the usual distance we need [tex](a+bi)(a-bi)=a^2+b^2+abi-abi = a^2+b^2[/tex].
The same is equally as true for a complex function. This isn't quantum mechanics it's just the math of complex numbers. In general the use of i in quantum mechanics is a bit of a misdirect for a lot of new students, and this isn't helped by many teachers making it seem mysterious. In reality the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics is similar to simply saying they there isn't ONE complex equation (the schrodinger equation) which must be followed but in fact two REAL equations. Indeed you can write all of quantum mechanics in such a way that complex numbers don't appear. |
| Jun29-12, 01:51 AM | #9 |
|
Blog Entries: 2
|
thank you sir but what is the usage of complex in Q m and why we need it ? and what happen if Q. M don't contain complex numbers
|
| Jun29-12, 05:08 AM | #10 |
|
|
Why do we multiply by the complex conjugate to get probabilities - its because of a very important theorem called Gleasons Theorem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleason's_theorem Basically it follows from some very reasonable assumptions about the probabilities we can define on a complex vector space. Sorry that the answer is mathematical and requires some linear algebra but its unfortunately in the nature of the beast. Thanks Bill |
| Jun29-12, 07:57 PM | #12 |
|
|
|
| Jun29-12, 08:34 PM | #13 |
|
|
|
| Jul6-12, 07:54 PM | #14 |
|
|
A general inner product on some [itex]L^{2}[/itex] space between two functions f and g is written as [itex](f | g ) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^{*}g\, dx [/itex]. The complex conjugation is so that the norm of a function is real valued, i.e. the magnitude of a vector (or function) is real. There are some cases within QM where [itex]\psi (x)[/itex] is real valued, such as the infinite square well wave functions, in which case the complex conjugation is unnecessary.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: why we multiply in ψ*
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Why Multiply? | Mechanical Engineering | 3 | ||
| Using 4x4 bit multipiers to do an 8x8 bit multiply | Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework | 3 | ||
| How to do 1565 x 1197 in 10 seconds without a calculator and paper? | Brain Teasers | 13 | ||
| The best way to multiply! | General Math | 5 | ||
| can i just multiply these? | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||