New Reply

why we multiply in ψ*

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun28-12, 07:45 AM   #1
 
Blog Entries: 2

why we multiply in ψ*


why in the quantum mechanics we must multiply ψ by ψ*

why we must multiply in the conjugate to find the probability density ?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Study provides better understanding of water's freezing behavior at nanoscale
>> Soft matter offers new ways to study how ordered materials arrange themselves
>> Making quantum encryption practical
Jun28-12, 07:59 AM   #2
 
using anything else will leave you with a complex result. Using the psi* gets you a real number.
Jun28-12, 09:03 AM   #3
 
Blog Entries: 2
so why is the probabiblty density = epsi in epsi*
Jun28-12, 11:35 AM   #4
 
Blog Entries: 2

why we multiply in ψ*


and why is the probability density equal to multiply OF epsi it self
Jun28-12, 01:19 PM   #5
 
perhaps this wikipedia article can explain it better:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

Part way down in the historical background section, the article mentions that Max Born interpreted the psi function as a probability amplitude which led to interpreting the psi*psi as the probability density something that physicists could measure in a system.
Jun28-12, 01:47 PM   #6
 
Multiplying by the complex conjugate gives you the norm squared. If you represent a complex number by the amplitude and phase, then multiplying by the complex conjugate is basically throwing away the phase information. We can't really measure the phase, only differences in phase. The phase is sort of a bookkeeping mechanism for keeping track of quantum interference.
Jun28-12, 03:52 PM   #7
 
Blog Entries: 2
thank you khashishi and jedishrfu i will read the article
Jun29-12, 12:36 AM   #8
 
That isn't a quantum mechanics thing, it's a complex numbers thing. The magnitude of a complex number is given by [tex]z^* z[/tex] not [tex]z^2[/tex]. Think about it, if instead of a complex number I thought of z as a 2-dimensional vector, an x and y coordinate (the y is the complex part). Then the, euclidian, distance from the origin would be [tex]x^2+y^2[/tex]. So for a complex number [tex] a+bi[/tex] you might think the "distance" from the origin to the point in the complex plane is simply [tex](a)^2+(bi)^2[/tex] but that's really [tex]a^2-b^2[/tex]. In order to get the usual distance we need [tex](a+bi)(a-bi)=a^2+b^2+abi-abi = a^2+b^2[/tex].

The same is equally as true for a complex function. This isn't quantum mechanics it's just the math of complex numbers. In general the use of i in quantum mechanics is a bit of a misdirect for a lot of new students, and this isn't helped by many teachers making it seem mysterious. In reality the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics is similar to simply saying they there isn't ONE complex equation (the schrodinger equation) which must be followed but in fact two REAL equations. Indeed you can write all of quantum mechanics in such a way that complex numbers don't appear.
Jun29-12, 01:51 AM   #9
 
Blog Entries: 2
thank you sir but what is the usage of complex in Q m and why we need it ? and what happen if Q. M don't contain complex numbers
Jun29-12, 05:08 AM   #10
 
Quote by sciboudy View Post
thank you sir but what is the usage of complex in Q m and why we need it ? and what happen if Q. M don't contain complex numbers
You need complex numbers to have infinitesimal displacements of apparatus used to observe systems. Such a displacement does not alter the laws of physics which, without spelling out the detail, means superpositions and lengths are preserved. For definiteness suppose you displace it by an infinitesimal distance dx then the whole quantum vector space is transformed by an operator of the form 1 + Udx where U is a linear operator - it must be linear since superpositions are preserved. Since lengths are preserved we have that 1 + Udx must be unitary which means (1 + Udx)(1 + U(bar)dx) = 1 which implies U = -U(bar) which means U is pure imaginary ie you must use complex numbers.

Why do we multiply by the complex conjugate to get probabilities - its because of a very important theorem called Gleasons Theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleason's_theorem

Basically it follows from some very reasonable assumptions about the probabilities we can define on a complex vector space.

Sorry that the answer is mathematical and requires some linear algebra but its unfortunately in the nature of the beast.

Thanks
Bill
Jun29-12, 03:44 PM   #11
 
Blog Entries: 2
thank you bill
Jun29-12, 07:57 PM   #12
 
Quote by sciboudy View Post
why in the quantum mechanics we must multiply ψ by ψ*

why we must multiply in the conjugate to find the probability density ?
Because ψ*ψ represents probability density, which is a real quantity. It is know that product of a complex number with its conjugate gives a real quantity.
Jun29-12, 08:34 PM   #13
 
Quote by sciboudy View Post
thank you sir but what is the usage of complex in Q m and why we need it ? and what happen if Q. M don't contain complex numbers
At least in some general and important cases the wave function can be made real http://www.physicsforums.com/showpos...68&postcount=9
Jul6-12, 07:54 PM   #14
 
A general inner product on some [itex]L^{2}[/itex] space between two functions f and g is written as [itex](f | g ) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^{*}g\, dx [/itex]. The complex conjugation is so that the norm of a function is real valued, i.e. the magnitude of a vector (or function) is real. There are some cases within QM where [itex]\psi (x)[/itex] is real valued, such as the infinite square well wave functions, in which case the complex conjugation is unnecessary.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: why we multiply in ψ*
Thread Forum Replies
Why Multiply? Mechanical Engineering 3
Using 4x4 bit multipiers to do an 8x8 bit multiply Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 3
How to do 1565 x 1197 in 10 seconds without a calculator and paper? Brain Teasers 13
The best way to multiply! General Math 5
can i just multiply these? Introductory Physics Homework 2